Vermont Diocese with $8.7M Abuse Verdict Can’t Find Insurance Policy

June 23, 2008

  • June 24, 2008 at 9:50 am
    TP says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    lastbat, RG, BGD,
    FIND SOMETHING BETTER TO DO!

  • June 24, 2008 at 10:11 am
    David says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    What’s the difference if the abuse happened last year or 20 years ago? If it happened these predators need to be thrown in jail where they can get a taste of their own medicine. Unfortunately, it took the monetary awards to wake up the leadership.

  • June 24, 2008 at 10:36 am
    Jenn says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    BGD – well said. Nothing was being done years ago. Unfortunately it took hitting the Church in the pocketbook to have the problem acknowledged instead of just moving the priests around to molest someone elses child in a different parish.

  • June 24, 2008 at 3:16 am
    Roy says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    These issues often do not get resolved in the best manner because of fundamental procedural defects.

    One of those defects is that punitive damages are paid to the victim which turns legal recourse into a jackpot system.

    Punitive damages should be paid into funds for communal benefit because the idea of punitive damages is to punish the wrongdoer and discourage the antisocial behavior in question, not to enrich the plaintiff.

    A state crime victims’ compensation fund would be good example of what should receive punitive damages.

    Plaintiffs should receive only actual damages with statutory limits on alleged emotional and psychological damages which are by nature intangible and uncertain.

    Plaintiffs’ lawyers could still get a percentage of punitive damages but it should be limited by law so that they still go after it but are not as preposterously enriched as they are now.

    There will always be donkeys on juries who throw other peoples’ money around like drunken sailors. That will not change.

    However, procedures could be improved.

    The public does not demand any such changes so the get-rich tort
    system continues without adjustment.

    Maybe that is what people want. They love to see jackpots and believe that lawyers are heroes who deserve to become extremely wealthy from contingency fees.

    Jury members are fallible and some are even quite stupid. Procedural improvements could be made but won’t happen until the public has the wit to demand it.

    The jackpots are there. Sue at every opportunity.

  • June 25, 2008 at 5:04 am
    nancy says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Alan and Dread are completely on right in this matter.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*