Many should look alot closer to certain issues that involve judges. Usually, when one story comes out, there is another more interesting one that can be told if we had the ENTIRE picture here.
Do we have any OTHER proof beyond this particular case that Judge Joyce would engage in conduct that could be questionable? The rules of law state a judge can not even GIVE THE APPEAREANCE OF IMPROPRIETY let alone ENGAGE in questionable conduct.
For instance, shady or shotty law practices which can be used against him.
OR even KNOWING something could be questionable and engaging as a judge could be considered treason.
Let’s just say we remove him from this case…can we find any others (cases) that would suggest he is corrupt and or dishonest?
I can certainly say, I don’t NEED to KNOW a man to look at a select few cases and tell you that they were less than stellar, especially when it comes to the Constituion of The United States.
What goes around quite certainly needs to come around and if we look deeper in to his actual work “BOUND BY LAW” and not if we “like him” or “know him”, than we can actually make an informed decision based on FACTS.
Unfortunately,(fortunately is some situations), it is not up to us and we can only hope that Judge Joyce’s ENTIRE record in his own judgement is used as evidence in the deciding factor of his fate as a high court Judge. He has had other’s lives in his hands at many junctures during his tenure as Judge in the Superior Court and hopefully he will be met with the same fairness or unfairness he has passed to other American Citizens in Pennsylvania appeallate process.
As most people may or may not be aware, most people do not even know or even are AWARE of the law being debated in this case, so many debates are scattered with what people “think” and “feel” instead of what they KNOW and are bound by LAW.
This is simply where the Judicial System happens to be. Joyce has presided over cases that dealt with Habeas Corpus, Crime Grading, Ex Post Facto Law etc and what does all that mean???
What is so up with all of you? EVerybody is so twitched. Law mandan, why are you so uppity? As a lawyer you claim to be, you should be used to critique. And you joyce supporter, why not let it rest? There are tons of idiots in the world that want to critique the elite-rise above it. I agree that the judgesshould be a bove reproach-and I believe a lawyer questioning that should be disbarred.
Are you saying that no lawyer at any time should criticize any judge on the basis of honesty and integrity? Are you saying that all judges are in fact honest all the time and deal with every case with total integrity?
Assuming you’re truly a lawyer, yes, I feel it is unethical for you to criticize judges. Lawyers and judges are bound by codes of ethics and I don’t think that you are doing a service to the profession by criticizing those that wear the robes.
Lawmandan is not a lawyer naive nottobe. He can’t be or he wouldn’t be that dumb. You can’t accuse judges of being corrupt..etc… That is an ethical violation and he should be disbarred but that’s not a problem since I don’t think he even qualifies for a ged.
Hey lawman, if you are a lawyer then you have a name and an attorney id, mind giving me that? I can give you my private address if you’d like? I hate to accuse you of being a non-lawyer when in fact you may be an unethical lawyer instead?
You guys are getting too off track and too silly here-I’m out. Glad we exposed Dan for who and what he really is and never will be (attorney!) Go Judge Joyce-I suggest all of you vote for a real man, an ethical man, an outstanding person, lawyer, and judge.
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
Many should look alot closer to certain issues that involve judges. Usually, when one story comes out, there is another more interesting one that can be told if we had the ENTIRE picture here.
Do we have any OTHER proof beyond this particular case that Judge Joyce would engage in conduct that could be questionable? The rules of law state a judge can not even GIVE THE APPEAREANCE OF IMPROPRIETY let alone ENGAGE in questionable conduct.
For instance, shady or shotty law practices which can be used against him.
OR even KNOWING something could be questionable and engaging as a judge could be considered treason.
Let’s just say we remove him from this case…can we find any others (cases) that would suggest he is corrupt and or dishonest?
I can certainly say, I don’t NEED to KNOW a man to look at a select few cases and tell you that they were less than stellar, especially when it comes to the Constituion of The United States.
What goes around quite certainly needs to come around and if we look deeper in to his actual work “BOUND BY LAW” and not if we “like him” or “know him”, than we can actually make an informed decision based on FACTS.
Unfortunately,(fortunately is some situations), it is not up to us and we can only hope that Judge Joyce’s ENTIRE record in his own judgement is used as evidence in the deciding factor of his fate as a high court Judge. He has had other’s lives in his hands at many junctures during his tenure as Judge in the Superior Court and hopefully he will be met with the same fairness or unfairness he has passed to other American Citizens in Pennsylvania appeallate process.
As most people may or may not be aware, most people do not even know or even are AWARE of the law being debated in this case, so many debates are scattered with what people “think” and “feel” instead of what they KNOW and are bound by LAW.
This is simply where the Judicial System happens to be. Joyce has presided over cases that dealt with Habeas Corpus, Crime Grading, Ex Post Facto Law etc and what does all that mean???
If you have to ask, that is exactly my point.
Dan, did you drop out of the conversation here? Can’t stand the heat? Proved me right-you’re not a lawyer, just an uneducated jealous bigot.
I am sufficiently educated to realize that calling people names and questioning the character of others is not worth my time.
What is so up with all of you? EVerybody is so twitched. Law mandan, why are you so uppity? As a lawyer you claim to be, you should be used to critique. And you joyce supporter, why not let it rest? There are tons of idiots in the world that want to critique the elite-rise above it. I agree that the judgesshould be a bove reproach-and I believe a lawyer questioning that should be disbarred.
Are you saying that no lawyer at any time should criticize any judge on the basis of honesty and integrity? Are you saying that all judges are in fact honest all the time and deal with every case with total integrity?
Assuming you’re truly a lawyer, yes, I feel it is unethical for you to criticize judges. Lawyers and judges are bound by codes of ethics and I don’t think that you are doing a service to the profession by criticizing those that wear the robes.
Lawmandan is not a lawyer naive nottobe. He can’t be or he wouldn’t be that dumb. You can’t accuse judges of being corrupt..etc… That is an ethical violation and he should be disbarred but that’s not a problem since I don’t think he even qualifies for a ged.
Hey lawman, if you are a lawyer then you have a name and an attorney id, mind giving me that? I can give you my private address if you’d like? I hate to accuse you of being a non-lawyer when in fact you may be an unethical lawyer instead?
You guys are getting too off track and too silly here-I’m out. Glad we exposed Dan for who and what he really is and never will be (attorney!) Go Judge Joyce-I suggest all of you vote for a real man, an ethical man, an outstanding person, lawyer, and judge.
All this fussin and now you not mussin-I used to be a damn good lawyer when I was lawyering. That beck witch hurt me.