I think you hit the nail on the head!!!!!
Fences for kids it even has a nice ring to it. But these fences will need to be made of rubber as to not hurt or injure the children of fools.
I understand the frustration many of you feel with laws that, on the surface, seem over protective. But think about if for a second. None of us are prefect parents. While as parents, we do our very best to keep track of our kids at all times. Who us would admit that we\’ve never lost track of our toddler at times. Even if only for a few seconds.
Children love dogs and are attracted to them. If you owned an aggressive dog, wouldn\’t you contain it so that little children would not get injured? Or would you let it run in a yard open to children?
Wading pools are just as attractive to toddlers…and potentially just as dangerous. It only takes a moment…to answer the phone, or to check on what\’s cooking, for attention to be diverted, for disaster to strike.
All I\’m saying is…don\’t be too quick to condem our lawmakers. Greed may not have been the motivator for the law. And if we don\’t like a law, we have it within our power to get it changed.
Kaso
You seem to think an intelligent person cannot train a stupid dog. You are wrong. If you think it is more important to answer a phone than to watch over your children you should not be a parent. If a fool has children the fool needs to pay the costs for a fence to protect their own chilren not me.
Also good intentions do not make good law. Fools are fools by choice and choice alone. No law will protect them from themselves.
It doesn\’t take a village to raise a child it takes responsible parenting. If you can\’t watch your children don\’t blame me!!!
How about a law against gravel driveways. My toddler tripped on gravel in a driveway and hit her head on a car, can I sue? how about a law against glass windows, they might break the glass and cut themselves, how about law against trees in your yard, they might climb it and fall. How about a law against flowers they attract bees and might get bit. Or the fresh cut grass that might give them an allergy. It is not a risk free world and in an effort to make it one we are crossing the line with a law for everything. You just can\’t fix stupid no matter how many laws you make.
It is not about being perfect it is about responsibility.
No one else is responsible for my children but my wife and I.
Not you, not my neighbor, not uncle sam, not anyone.
And just as important I AM NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR CHILDREN AND YOUR INABILITY TO TRAIN A DOG!!!!!!!
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
Why not just put a fence around the child?
WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO SOCIETY???????
Lawyers!!!!!!!
I think you hit the nail on the head!!!!!
Fences for kids it even has a nice ring to it. But these fences will need to be made of rubber as to not hurt or injure the children of fools.
I just find myself shaking my head more everyday! Thank God I didn\’t have children!!
I understand the frustration many of you feel with laws that, on the surface, seem over protective. But think about if for a second. None of us are prefect parents. While as parents, we do our very best to keep track of our kids at all times. Who us would admit that we\’ve never lost track of our toddler at times. Even if only for a few seconds.
Children love dogs and are attracted to them. If you owned an aggressive dog, wouldn\’t you contain it so that little children would not get injured? Or would you let it run in a yard open to children?
Wading pools are just as attractive to toddlers…and potentially just as dangerous. It only takes a moment…to answer the phone, or to check on what\’s cooking, for attention to be diverted, for disaster to strike.
All I\’m saying is…don\’t be too quick to condem our lawmakers. Greed may not have been the motivator for the law. And if we don\’t like a law, we have it within our power to get it changed.
Kaso
You seem to think an intelligent person cannot train a stupid dog. You are wrong. If you think it is more important to answer a phone than to watch over your children you should not be a parent. If a fool has children the fool needs to pay the costs for a fence to protect their own chilren not me.
Also good intentions do not make good law. Fools are fools by choice and choice alone. No law will protect them from themselves.
It doesn\’t take a village to raise a child it takes responsible parenting. If you can\’t watch your children don\’t blame me!!!
Perfect Parent – 1
Kaso – 0
How about a law against gravel driveways. My toddler tripped on gravel in a driveway and hit her head on a car, can I sue? how about a law against glass windows, they might break the glass and cut themselves, how about law against trees in your yard, they might climb it and fall. How about a law against flowers they attract bees and might get bit. Or the fresh cut grass that might give them an allergy. It is not a risk free world and in an effort to make it one we are crossing the line with a law for everything. You just can\’t fix stupid no matter how many laws you make.
It is not about being perfect it is about responsibility.
No one else is responsible for my children but my wife and I.
Not you, not my neighbor, not uncle sam, not anyone.
And just as important I AM NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR CHILDREN AND YOUR INABILITY TO TRAIN A DOG!!!!!!!
AMEN