Burke’s Law

Sixth Circuit Highlights the Importance of Policy Definitions

In one of the more unusual cases interpreting terms of an insurance policy, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has highlighted the importance of policy definitions. In Bennett v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 19494, …

The Changing Landscape of Defective Construction Claims and Commercial General Liability Policies

Coverage for defective construction claims under commercial general liability (CGL) policies remains an important and frequently contested issue, and the last year has seen significant developments on the issue. Courts have taken varying approaches to the question and applied different …

Florida Clarifies That Extrinsic Evidence May Not Be Used to Resolve Policy Ambiguities

The Florida Supreme Court recently issued an important decision on the use of extrinsic evidence to resolve ambiguities in policy language. In Wash. Nat’l Ins. Co. v. Ruderman, No. SC12-323 (Fla. Jul. 3, 2013), the Florida Supreme Court answered a …

Wisconsin Supreme Court Narrows Definition of ‘Occurrence’

Public policy and insurance law allow insurance coverage only for fortuitous events and not for harm or loss resulting from intentional acts. To this end, insurance policies provide coverage when an injury or loss is caused by an “occurrence” which …

New York Insurers Breaching Duty to Defend May Not Assert Policy Exclusions

The New York Court of Appeals has reaffirmed the importance of the insurer’s duty to defend its insureds, holding that when an insurer breaches its duty to defend, it may not rely on exclusions in the policy to avoid coverage …

Characterizing Separate Claims as Single Claims for Policy Coverage

Determining whether claims made under an insurance policy are multiple claims or a single claim is an important exercise that can have significant coverage implications relating to coverage dates, policy limits and other policy considerations. Claims-made insurance policies are typically …

The Insurer’s Duty to Provide Independent Counsel in Illinois

Illinois law requires insurers to provide independent counsel for their insured when a conflict of interest arises. The duty developed from balancing the insurer’s obligation to defend the insured with the ethical obligations of appointed attorneys, and is firmly grounded …

The Insurer’s Duty to Provide Independent Counsel in Alaska

This is part two of a three part series focusing on an insurer’s duty to provide independent counsel in Alaska, California and Illinois. Read Part 1. Alaska imposes a broad duty on insurers to provide independent counsel for the insured …

The Insurer’s Duty to Provide Independent Counsel in California

This is part one of a three part series focusing on an insurer’s duty to provide independent counsel in Alaska, California and Illinois. Under liability insurance policies, an insurer has a duty to indemnify the insured for loss as well …

Court Determines Priority of Coverage Where Employer is Vicariously Liable

A California appellate court recently clarified the priority of coverage where multiple insurers are implicated for the acts of a negligent employee. In GuideOne Mutual Insurance Company v. Utica National Insurance Group, 2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 148, the court held …

Burke’s Law Archives by Month