<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>employment disputes Archives - Claims Journal</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.claimsjournal.com/topics/employment-disputes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.claimsjournal.com/topics/employment-disputes/</link>
	<description>Insurance news and resources for the claims industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:52:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Wal-Mart v. Dukes Shakes Up Employment Class Actions</title>
		<link>https://www.claimsjournal.com/news/national/2012/01/10/198536.htm</link>
		
						<dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin]]></dc:creator>
						<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment class actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart v. Dukes]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.claimsjournal.com/?p=198536</guid>

							<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court&#8217;s decision in Wal-Mart v. Dukes, heralded last term as a game-changer in employment class actions, has lived up to the hype. Since the Court issued the Dukes decision in June, it has been cited by lower courts &#8230;]]></description>
				
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
