<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>direct action statute Archives - Claims Journal</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.claimsjournal.com/topics/direct-action-statute/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.claimsjournal.com/topics/direct-action-statute/</link>
	<description>Insurance news and resources for the claims industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 16:00:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Md. High Court: No Coverage Owed for Lead Paint Exposure After Policies Rescinded</title>
		<link>https://www.claimsjournal.com/news/east/2022/08/31/312459.htm</link>
		
						<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Sams]]></dc:creator>
						<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 05:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[East News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beneficiaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct action statute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landlords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead paint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryland Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy rescission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tort claims]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.claimsjournal.com/?p=312459</guid>

							<description><![CDATA[Insurers that rescinded general liability policies issued to landlords who misrepresented their exposure to lead paint claims owe no coverage to 12 plaintiffs who had not yet obtained final court judgments, Maryland&#8217;s high court ruled. The Court of Appeals on &#8230;]]></description>
				
		
		<enclosure url="https://www.claimsjournal.com/app/uploads/2021/04/bigstock-lead.paint_-580x348.jpg" length="67162" type="image/jpeg" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>NJ Supreme: Statute Allows Construction Defect Claim; Arbitration Clause Applies</title>
		<link>https://www.claimsjournal.com/news/east/2022/07/19/311642.htm</link>
		
						<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Sams]]></dc:creator>
						<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2022 05:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[East News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[binding arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[construction defect litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[default judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct action statute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third party claims]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.claimsjournal.com/?p=311642</guid>

							<description><![CDATA[New Jersey&#8217;s Direct Action Statute allows a condominium association&#8217;s construction defects claims against an insurer, but the plaintiff must comply with a binding arbitration clause in the policies, the state Supreme Court ruled Monday. The unanimous decision overturns rulings by &#8230;]]></description>
				
		
		<enclosure url="https://www.claimsjournal.com/app/uploads/2022/07/Crystal.Cove_.Condos-580x337.png" length="308554" type="image/png" />	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Louisiana’s Direct Action Statute Doesn’t Substantively Modify Claims-Made Policy Notice Provisions</title>
		<link>https://www.claimsjournal.com/news/southcentral/2014/10/22/256654.htm</link>
		
						<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Plitt]]></dc:creator>
						<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Texas / South Central News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claims made policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct action statute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gorman v. City of Opelousas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Plitt]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.claimsjournal.com/?p=256654</guid>

							<description><![CDATA[Typical claims-made insurance policies require claims to be both made and reported within the applicable policy period. Under this type of policy, the risk of a claim incurred but not made, as well as a claim made but not reported, &#8230;]]></description>
				
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
