This is another example of misguided results-oriented jurisprudence. The Oregon Supreme Court felt sorry for the kid so they looked for a way to give him some money…period. Their logic is flawed…there is nothing compelling someone to participate in a per se loaded-with-risk sporting activity. Creating an absolute liability standard just screws every other winter sports participant.
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
This is another example of misguided results-oriented jurisprudence. The Oregon Supreme Court felt sorry for the kid so they looked for a way to give him some money…period. Their logic is flawed…there is nothing compelling someone to participate in a per se loaded-with-risk sporting activity. Creating an absolute liability standard just screws every other winter sports participant.