Wal-Mart created the condition, so they can’t claim they were not on notice. This is not like a situation where a customer spilled some liquid and Wal-Mart didn’t have time to be put on notice and react.
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
What about “notice”? If WalMart wasn’t aware the condition existed and caused a slipping hazard there should be no liability.
Wal-Mart created the condition, so they can’t claim they were not on notice. This is not like a situation where a customer spilled some liquid and Wal-Mart didn’t have time to be put on notice and react.