I HAVE FILED SEVERAL COMPLAINTS SINCE APRIL 2008 . I AM STILL WAITING FOR A DETERMINATION. i WAS TOLD THAT MY COMPLAINT I FILED WOULD BE HEARD IN JUNE 2008 AT THE MEETING OF THE COMMITTEE. IN JUNE I WAS TOLD BY MR. STARKESON, STATED THAT THE COMMEETTE NEEDED TO DO FURTHER INVESTIGATION,AND IT WOULD BE CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER . iN SEPTEMBER I WAS TOLD THAT THEY DID NOT MEET. NOW IT’S PUT OFF TO DECEMBER. WELL THE NEWLY APPOINTED JUDGE WILL HAVE A YEAR AND I’M SURE THAT NOW SHE WILL HAVE SOME PROTECTION AS MOST LIKELY SHE WILL NOT BE ON PROBATION ANY LONGER. THOUGH THIS JUDGE INSTRUCTED THE DEFENSE TO GO CALL THE DOCTOR OUT SIDE THE HEARING, EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS, THE DEFENSE SENT THE JUDGE AND EX PARTE LETTER.WHICH I DID NOT RECEIVED A COPY OF NOR DID THE JUDGE FOLLOW THE RULES AS STATED UNDER THE CANONS, TO FOWARD TO APPLICANT A COPY OF THE EX PARTE LETER ALONG WITH A COVER LETTER. ALSO THE JUDGE IN LESS THAN THIRITY DAYS OF RECEIVIING THE EX PARTE LETTER FROM THE DEFENSE, THE JUDGE SUSPENDED APPLICANTS’ PETITION FOR UNREASONABLE DELAYS,LYING UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY ON A DOR, BAD FAITH AND FRIVILOUS ACTS THE LIST CONTINUES . AS YOU PROBALY CAN TELL THIS IS A CASE UNDER WORKERS’ COMPENSATION.
PRO-PER APPLICANT. THE SAGA CONTINUES
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
I HAVE FILED SEVERAL COMPLAINTS SINCE APRIL 2008 . I AM STILL WAITING FOR A DETERMINATION. i WAS TOLD THAT MY COMPLAINT I FILED WOULD BE HEARD IN JUNE 2008 AT THE MEETING OF THE COMMITTEE. IN JUNE I WAS TOLD BY MR. STARKESON, STATED THAT THE COMMEETTE NEEDED TO DO FURTHER INVESTIGATION,AND IT WOULD BE CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER . iN SEPTEMBER I WAS TOLD THAT THEY DID NOT MEET. NOW IT’S PUT OFF TO DECEMBER. WELL THE NEWLY APPOINTED JUDGE WILL HAVE A YEAR AND I’M SURE THAT NOW SHE WILL HAVE SOME PROTECTION AS MOST LIKELY SHE WILL NOT BE ON PROBATION ANY LONGER. THOUGH THIS JUDGE INSTRUCTED THE DEFENSE TO GO CALL THE DOCTOR OUT SIDE THE HEARING, EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS, THE DEFENSE SENT THE JUDGE AND EX PARTE LETTER.WHICH I DID NOT RECEIVED A COPY OF NOR DID THE JUDGE FOLLOW THE RULES AS STATED UNDER THE CANONS, TO FOWARD TO APPLICANT A COPY OF THE EX PARTE LETER ALONG WITH A COVER LETTER. ALSO THE JUDGE IN LESS THAN THIRITY DAYS OF RECEIVIING THE EX PARTE LETTER FROM THE DEFENSE, THE JUDGE SUSPENDED APPLICANTS’ PETITION FOR UNREASONABLE DELAYS,LYING UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY ON A DOR, BAD FAITH AND FRIVILOUS ACTS THE LIST CONTINUES . AS YOU PROBALY CAN TELL THIS IS A CASE UNDER WORKERS’ COMPENSATION.
PRO-PER APPLICANT. THE SAGA CONTINUES