um….we can always speculate and more than likely it’ll be safety issue. but if it is truly a risky issue of the taking out the support beam and do a so-called collapse of the ceiling, why? there was probably a half-dozen ways to backtrack folks and equipment out and then collapse.
basically, he says and then the families speculate. no proof that it was actually the compaies fault — it could have been a mother nature event. that will take some proof. after all, mother nature does not attend trial. ask hurrican katrina!
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
um….we can always speculate and more than likely it’ll be safety issue. but if it is truly a risky issue of the taking out the support beam and do a so-called collapse of the ceiling, why? there was probably a half-dozen ways to backtrack folks and equipment out and then collapse.
basically, he says and then the families speculate. no proof that it was actually the compaies fault — it could have been a mother nature event. that will take some proof. after all, mother nature does not attend trial. ask hurrican katrina!
Agree w/you. Working in a dark hole drilled miles underground has always been and will always be dangerous. Assumption of risk?