Calif. Brothers Arrested for Fraud

August 20, 2007

  • August 20, 2007 at 4:36 am
    Scooter says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    It seems the 2nd brother lived up to his name alright.

    I guess their parents aren’t gonna be too happy either.(lol)

    Still, I wonder who tipped off the CDI investigator? The agent? the claims person?
    Cheers goes out to this silent hero.

  • August 20, 2007 at 5:15 am
    N. Judge says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I’d agree that we don’t prosecute nearly enough of the fraud we see in this industry. As for sustained cultures, I won’t begin to malign one that is much older than ours. And clearly we’re entitled to believe whatever we will. And to disagree. Well OK: It can be funny how names tranlate, too. I’m often curious how they choose to spell them when you come from a language that uses different characters. Do we spell with accent, etc? Gangsters are not gone from NY, by the way. Anyone handle any No Fault in NY?

  • August 20, 2007 at 6:33 am
    Ahab says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    One tenth of one percent of fraud is ever even considered by insurance companies in this country because the penalties paid in libel and slander suits is just too dear. A carrier has to actually catch people in the act in order to make such a case. I’ve defended cases where the arsonist was sitting in prison for two years before the insurance company could get the libel/slander lawsuit he brought against them before his actual conviction for the arson dismissed. The legal fees generated by the process were huge, but in the end the arsonist is still in prison and the insurance company is still in business. The insured was actually arrested during the course of his deposition. No wonder insurance companies are reluctant to pursue these scumbags.

  • August 21, 2007 at 12:36 pm
    N. Judge says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Where do you practice? Most states have statutes that protect against the libel issue; it’s not as if we’re broadcasting the insured’s alleged fraud. The bigger issue for us has always been the allegations of bad faith that could have you paying far in excess of policy limits.

  • August 27, 2007 at 1:09 am
    Lighter Side says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    You guys all need to lighten up… I still can’t get over the fact there is someone named mahboob. :-)

  • April 8, 2008 at 11:10 am
    Not biased says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I highly doubt that these “two brothers” have done such a thing based on their culture. Who is one to judge that? It just may be the way society is today and how flashy things may appeal the majority. So they just might want to live up to society’s lifestyle.

  • April 8, 2008 at 11:15 am
    Not biased says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    These two men have no right to set an image for Islam. I am not a Muslim but I certainly would not look at a religion based on these men. I have seen many Christians commit bigger crimes but I do not judge Christianity based on this one person’s mistake.

  • November 20, 2009 at 3:09 am
    Tony damarcus says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Ive read all the past comments and i am did as much as research as i can. Lets not judge them by what the paper says…i have read the full report, the older bro masood was set up by his own friend that owns a body shop, whom is an informant for the cops. he himself was doing fruad out of his body shop so in order for him to get credit he set up masood. As for the younger brother Mahboob(unique name) all he did was lied for his bro 2 months after the whole intrapment happened. I would to do anything for my Blood. do to our system being so currupted anything can happend to anyone. We need to wake up and realize whats going on in our own system.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*