I think the Republican party would do well in making a real effort to weed these folks out of their party and get back to their core values. I certainly don\’t agree with the right on all the issues, however I think it is very difficult to get out your points with a new scandal breaking almost every week.
Also, I\’m certainly not saying the other side doesn\’t have its scandals, but it\’s getting to an unbelievable level on the right.
Obviously I could go on, but the business of insurance is calling.
Equally obvious is both sides of the isle are guilty of misdeeds, but the left gets a pass because they don\’t stand for anything and the main stream media is on their side.
Yes, both sides are equally scandalous but to cry foul stating the media is liberal and \”on their side\” is such a WEAK argument. Don\’t you have any facts or concrete evidence instead of opinions?
I\’m involved in both politics and insurance. I\’m sad to say that both occupations and avocations seem to attract a disproportionate of the ethically challenged.
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
Just another Republican crook (oxymnoron).
Love to see the AZ Commissioner audit him.
Is a Democratic crook an oxymoron too?
Democrat Crook may bew an oxymoron, but Jewel ia just a moron…….
Really? Just how did you JUMP to that conclusion?
I didn\’t insult you.
Please grow up.
And use spellcheck.
I think the Republican party would do well in making a real effort to weed these folks out of their party and get back to their core values. I certainly don\’t agree with the right on all the issues, however I think it is very difficult to get out your points with a new scandal breaking almost every week.
Also, I\’m certainly not saying the other side doesn\’t have its scandals, but it\’s getting to an unbelievable level on the right.
The only reason Republican scandals appear to be at \”unbelieveable levels\” is because liberals run the news.
I googled some top Dems using last name and scandal. Didn\’t bother with Jefferson of LA because $90,000 cash in the freezer is hard to sweep under the rug. Here are the links:
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&aq=t&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLR,GGLR:2006-09,GGLR:en&q=pelosi+scandal
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLR,GGLR:2006-09,GGLR:en&q=feinstein+scandal
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=GGLR%2CGGLR%3A2006-09%2CGGLR%3Aen&q=murtha+scandal
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=GGLR%2CGGLR%3A2006-09%2CGGLR%3Aen&q=reid+scandal
Murderer: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=GGLR%2CGGLR%3A2006-09%2CGGLR%3Aen&q=kennedy+scandal
Gay Whorehouse: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=GGLR%2CGGLR%3A2006-09%2CGGLR%3Aen&q=frank+scandal
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2001/0201.mencimer.html
Obviously I could go on, but the business of insurance is calling.
Equally obvious is both sides of the isle are guilty of misdeeds, but the left gets a pass because they don\’t stand for anything and the main stream media is on their side.
Yes, both sides are equally scandalous but to cry foul stating the media is liberal and \”on their side\” is such a WEAK argument. Don\’t you have any facts or concrete evidence instead of opinions?
I\’m involved in both politics and insurance. I\’m sad to say that both occupations and avocations seem to attract a disproportionate of the ethically challenged.