Jury Awards Woman $101,500 for Premature Baby Born after Crash

June 5, 2006

  • June 6, 2006 at 3:13 am
    Compman says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Good thing that the Jury was conservative. God knows that if it was a liberal jury, they would say it wasn\’t a viable person as they believe it is ok to kill a baby by abortion right up to the third trimester. Shame on the insurance company for even letting this drag into a courtroom. If I represented that company, I would not anymore.

  • June 12, 2006 at 2:09 am
    Cut the Crud says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    AMEN Compman! Their insured causes the accident, kills the child and they say it\’s \”not viable.\” Yes, due to their accident!! What a sad state of affairs. That the higher-ups at this carrier let this argument go this far is a disgrace.

  • June 12, 2006 at 3:16 am
    Stretch says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Another sad case of insurance companies going out of their way to maintain the bad reputation that they have with the general public.

  • November 27, 2007 at 8:07 am
    Anonymous says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Questions of liability: Did the auto accident cause the unborn baby’s death? Was it guaranteed that a healthy baby was going to be born at 9 months? Was the unborn baby a passenger in the vehicle with a seat belt?



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*