Standard & Poor’s Downgrades Mercury Insurance from Stable to Negative

June 1, 2006

  • June 1, 2006 at 8:37 am
    Mark says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Whatever Reality check, a customer can cancel their insurance with you and choose whatever replacement policy they want. They see the application they sign, so it\’s their own fault.

    Mercury is a terrible company anyway, poor claims service, an outdated endorsement process, rude customer service reps, pain in the butt underwriters, etc. Maybe you should requote your accounts with another good company.

  • June 1, 2006 at 9:13 am
    Reality Check says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    As far as the customer signing the application, I agree it\’s their fault. However, the agent should be an agent and not misinform or fail to inform them of the coverage gaps from the prior policy. And with the Department of Ignorance in Sacramento, an agent should offer all of the rates to his/her client and let them choose the company. But at the same time, the client usually wants price. If the playing field is level, Mercury wins the majority of the time.

    Actually, we represent many good companies and Mercury\’s underwriting has proven time and time again to be sound. I don\’t always agree with it, but underwriting based on lifestyle is accurate better than 80% of the time. We apply the Mercury methods to all of our carriers and the client wins with better rates and policies that are valid(what a concept)! What\’s funny is that our other carriers are benefiting from this practice by our book being more profitable.

    Most agents don\’t like the work Mercury has them do. They just want to help(actually hurt) the next customer that walks through or calls. They just like the money and most mills(Geico, 21st Century, AAA, Farmers, Etc.) don\’t care about the client, they only care about the new customer and policy count. Most brokers could care less how long a policy stays on the books since the Fee is fully earned and they\’ll get another one when they rewrite them.

  • June 1, 2006 at 4:09 am
    A Broker says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I see that \”competitive pricing\” has FINALLY caught up with this carrier. Perhaps this will \”level the playing field\” a bit for ALL of us NON-Appointed brokers.

  • June 1, 2006 at 6:41 am
    Reality Check says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Unfortunately, it hasn\’t been \”competitive pricing\” at all. It has been more of the carrier or their employees(non licensed)telling the consumer that they are saving them money without explaining the reductions in coverage. Geico, 21st Century, AAA, Farmers have all taken policyholders from our agency by writing lower limits, policies without med or UM, higher deductibles, and often lying about annual mileage and usage to \”level the playing field\” for themselves. Without proper underwriting and actuarial facts, no company can properly set rates. And, unfortunately, the consumer is left exposed and the carrier could care less. They just like to say they saved the average customer $xxx.00. They don\’t like to say, they\’ve exposed their customer to $xxx,xxx.00 in losses.

    We are now requiring replacement decs which will be mailed to the DOI along with the original decs as complaints againt these fraud artists. That way we will all be on a \”level playing field\”!

  • June 2, 2006 at 4:05 am
    Mark says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    No, I\’m all for helping the customer, which is why I won\’t use Mercury. Tell me, are you able to run an MVR through Mercury prior to writing the policy? Not here in Texas. How about Mercury calling the customer after you write the policy to check up on an agent\’s work? Insulting. And the customer is inconvenienced. How about Mercury\’s claim department? everything is denied, then they lose in court or arbitration. What about a customer asking how much the price will change for a particular policy change? Can\’t do that with Mercury, you have to call or just submit it and see, after they take a month to process it.

    They might be ok rate wise in California, but they sure have turned into the insurer of last resort for Texas independent agents.

    And don\’t get me started on billing help. They\’re unhappy and make the customer feel like they\’re going out of their way to help with a billing issue.

  • June 2, 2006 at 5:04 am
    KEN says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    As an agent in FL for one of those so called insurance mills I can assure you I do not write policies with lower limits or lacking coverage to beat a price from another carrier. I always explain how lowering coverage is not beneficial. The same goes for the other agents I work with. When a customer informs me that they have found something cheaper (especially if they have done the quote by themselves on line) I ask them to bring it in so we can make sure they are being quoted the same coverage. If a competitor’s quote is better so be it. I will not compromise my name to make a sell or keep a policy. I had Mercury before I became an agent. My broker stopped writing for them becuase of claim denials.

  • June 3, 2006 at 3:07 am
    A Broker says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    All of your comments have been very enlightening and from Fla. to Texas to my office here in Ca. I find the end results the same: Mercury deserves what they are getting.

    It is refreshing to know there are \”other\” brokers across this nation who write policies the way we do in MY brokerage: using accurate information, providing all coverages (which have been fully explained to the applicant) requested and/or needed by the applicant AND offering insurance that will pass the \”test of time\” should the applicant need to reLY on it (if and when the time comes).

    And, you have (both) affirmed what we have HEARD so often here in my state: Mercury Insurance\’s (so-called) \”Claims Department\” is a farce: unreliable, undependable and difficult to deal with if called upon for \”coverages\” purchased by the applicant/insured/buyer.

    We offer our \”clients/insureds\” accurately quoted, dependable INSURANCE that will NOT \”blow up\” in the face of the insured and/or cause THIS brokerage either embarrassment and/or an E&O claim. WOW….now isn\’t THAT a novel idea that many of our \”competitors\” could learn from if they\’d live up to their licenses.

    Enough said…and thanks for your honesty. Believe it or not, our clients DO appreciate it.

  • June 4, 2006 at 3:15 am
    Reality Check says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Unfortunately in CA, the claims com-plaints against Mercury have been unfounded for the 20+ years we\’ve been writing for them. I guess that\’s because we explain the process and the morally correct way of obtaining insurance to our clients. Of course we\’re in the central valley where morals still exist! Northern and Southern CA lost that long ago. That\’s one of the many reasons we are three states in one.

    And if all brokers in CA would follow the \”Golden Rule\”, and consumers were truly informed in CA, maybe this wouldn\’t be an issue. Also, 15/30/5 would have been sufficient in 1967 when the FR section was added to the DMV code. However, I don\’t know too many insured\’s who could afford having 33% of their wage taken away due to a judgement in 2006.

    Mercury really came into existence at the same time(1963) schools in the US denied theirs!
    Enough said!

  • June 5, 2006 at 11:03 am
    AJ says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Sad But true…..Your Just Jealous. I\’m a Mercury Agent. I am swamped. The phone is ringing off the hook. Those that cant wait to go to the annual luncheon and get paid. Got to go sell more policies. I think I sold 150 polcies last month. If you can\’t compete you must talk bad about the competition. Who\’s Sorry now my Ha Ha. Keep sending your birthday cards to try to retain and I will continue to crush you.

    Sorry all you State Farm, Farmers & All State Agents. All My Clients say I love Mercury. S & P??? Who\’s stuffing your pocket.

  • June 5, 2006 at 4:54 am
    CA Broker says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    If Gecko rep lies and says split limits are the same as combined, or says you are getting the same coverage when you are not, then it is not the fault of the insured. The insured is stupid, but thats just his nature so its not his fault.

    The lies are mostly done verbally so they wont get caught.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*