Calif. Commissioner Grills Insurers on Underinsured Homeowner Problem

October 22, 2004

  • October 22, 2004 at 8:44 am
    ken p says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    nice comments, sounds like you insurance agents should be selling cars. as an agent you should keep abreast of local building costs, contact insureds on needed coverage and advise them properly. you would have to have your head in the sand to not know building costs have skyrocketed in california. computer programs are no substitute for good work ethic.

  • October 22, 2004 at 9:06 am
    John says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Let’s see, he wanted to be gov so he quit DOI job, lost nom, was put into seclusion by Clint Admin, returned, got commish job again, now wants to trade positions with Bust-e-monte, then to gov when Arnie’s done. In the meantime he is going to make the Ins. industry the fall guys for insureds who want to save a few bucks in premium. Sounds like everything is going the way he wants it for now! In the meantime we (ins) do nothing other than say, how high is the water, 3′ foot and still rising! At some point we let this idiot drown us in regulation or the threat of…..

  • October 22, 2004 at 1:17 am
    Smitty says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    On why it cost 200% more to build a house in CA than the rest of the country.

  • October 22, 2004 at 1:34 am
    Jere Allan says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    As Ceasar was ambitious, so is Garamendi.
    His eye is on the governor’s job, and like
    Senator Kerry, he is willing to do anything to get there.

  • October 22, 2004 at 1:49 am
    Compman says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    It will be a cold day in hell before Quackamendi becomes Governor. He has left a legacy of dirty deals while in the Commissioner’s job (i.e, State Fund RBC audit). As far as I am concerned, he should go back to farming and get out of politics as he does more harm than good.

  • October 23, 2004 at 2:15 am
    A. Herrmann says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    If you are sick and go to your doctor, you don’t ask or tell what the kind and dose of medicine is going to be. The doctor does that. The same goes for the insurance agent. We asked our agent twice–6 months before the fire and the day of the fire because we were worried it wasn’t enough. And they said not to worry, we were completely covered. We found out like 95% of all the fire victims, we were grossly underinsured. It costs at least $200 a square foot for the average house to be rebuilt, more like $300 with today’s building costs. Times that and the orginal square feet of your house and you will get a closer estimate of what your house will cost to rebuild. This is a house with no extras! And if the insurance companies used the full quote of Marshall and Swift, they would have come closer to these figures.

  • October 22, 2004 at 2:20 am
    Sanddog says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Hey I have and idea, how about talking to the builders. Who over charges when the insurance check is in the mail. It should not and does cost $300 sq ft to build these stucco homes.

  • October 22, 2004 at 2:34 am
    Insuranceperson says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Good for you! All of your comments are right on the mark! Quackamendi did a crappy job as commissioner the first time around & is doing the same thing this time. How did he get reelected? The industry needs to strike back or we will be in deeper trouble!

  • October 22, 2004 at 2:38 am
    fmkeller says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    ANYONE KNOWS YOU CAN ONLY WRITE WHAT THE INSURED WILL PAY FOR WHERE HAS YOUR COMMISSIONER BEEN?

  • October 22, 2004 at 2:41 am
    Mark says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    We see issues similar to this all year long on total loss properties due the the different quality of homes built in CA. You can have a house that would require $117/sq.ft. to rebuild next door to a house that is $300/sq.ft. both insured by the same carrier. Whos responsiblity is it to insure the property at its correct value? The homeowner, insurance carrier, broker or agent selling the policy?



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*