Does Florida attempt to fix a broken no fault system or abandon it entirely in favor of a tort approach? While Judge Lewis notes the dichotomy: “limits medical coverage while at the same time limiting access to the courts”, that’s no argument for the status quo in the face of rampant fraudsters, corrupt healthcare practitioners and a state embarrassment. The problem of course lies in the ease of legislative change; while scrapping no fault may be ideal, Gov. Scott’s overhaul might be considered a practicable short/medium term solution. If the bill is successful, whether drivers will see any real premium benefit is another matter.
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
Does Florida attempt to fix a broken no fault system or abandon it entirely in favor of a tort approach? While Judge Lewis notes the dichotomy: “limits medical coverage while at the same time limiting access to the courts”, that’s no argument for the status quo in the face of rampant fraudsters, corrupt healthcare practitioners and a state embarrassment. The problem of course lies in the ease of legislative change; while scrapping no fault may be ideal, Gov. Scott’s overhaul might be considered a practicable short/medium term solution. If the bill is successful, whether drivers will see any real premium benefit is another matter.
just thanks for sharing us :)