North Carolina Appeals Court Rules in Legal Fight Over Dead Dog

By MICHAEL BIESECKER | February 23, 2012

  • February 23, 2012 at 3:19 pm
    Jester says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 5
    Thumb down 14

    This woman is one sick puppy herself. If not amount of money will replace it, then money shouldn’t be an issue. This dog had a plethora of serious problems that might have killed it regardless. Some people are delusional about pets. They have a limited life expectancy and are pieces of property…..they can’t be compared to a human life. The offer of a new pet and reimbursement of out of pocket expenses is more than fair. Get over it lady.

    • January 8, 2015 at 11:29 pm
      petey says:
      Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 5
      Thumb down 0

      You are an idiot……..you OBVIOUSLY do NOT know one DARN thing about this case. NCS Vet School caused LACI’S ISSUES YOU idiot. Can you read…???????
      NCS ADMITTED their GUILT IN KILLING Laci …….

      You get over it…… num skull.!!!! It IS AMAZING THAT you THINK with out the data and knowledge …. THAT YOU CAN make SUCH A stupid, ignorant, COMMENT YOU dumb idiot.!!!!! They tortured Laci
      to her death.!!!!! They admitted it.!!!

  • February 23, 2012 at 3:43 pm
    Bob says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 3
    Thumb down 6

    as a pet lover myself, I think Jester’s comments are a little harsh, but actually close to being realistic. the dog was well along in years, and was probably “on borrowed time” as it was. in my state, and probably others, you can’t claim the “love” value of the pet, only the “market” value. stuff happens; go on with life. get a new dog. that’s what I have had to do many times thru the years.

  • February 23, 2012 at 4:48 pm
    She said it herself says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 1
    Thumb down 1

    “…You cannot replace Laci.” So, don’t give her anything! Remember…it’s not about the money (which she also said).

  • February 24, 2012 at 3:44 pm
    C says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 5
    Thumb down 0

    Justice should still be served for the family and the poor dog. If it werent for the vet techs stupidity, that dog would still be alive. The woman paid for the dog to BEAT CANCER, then to later lose it to a HUMAN ERROR. I would be just as outraged and sue the hell out of the vet that killed him!!! GO NANCY!!!!!!!!!

  • June 28, 2013 at 12:57 am
    petey says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 4
    Thumb down 0

    Oh……you know the saying “unless you have walked a mile in my shoes.”??? WELL……unless you lived what Laci and her family did, you have no idea what these Vets and the Vet school gets away with. They get away with way too many NEGLIGENT acts, and the law needs to be changed now. The law in this state is archaic. Laci was forced to suffer a horrible death. And NOT ONE VET, NOT ONE helped her. She struggled for her life for hours until they killed her. Now is that too STRONG for all you “know it all jerks,” that have no clue about this case? Keep your stupid, unintelligent, uninformed, comments to yourself. Get busy and fight to change the law for ALL our beloved companions.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*