Amazing that it took the SUPREME COURT to explain that “an insured” would be all insureds who could be identified as “any insured” under the policy. At least they didn’t have to also explain the meaning of “is”.
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
Amazing that it took the SUPREME COURT to explain that “an insured” would be all insureds who could be identified as “any insured” under the policy. At least they didn’t have to also explain the meaning of “is”.
I think you have a point there Little Frog, which is part of what I tried to explain in my own blog post about this case.