South Carolina Court Shifts Liability to Contractors January 25, 2011 Email This Subscribe to Newsletter Email to a friend Facebook Tweet LinkedIn Print Article Article 2 Comments January 25, 2011 at 2:46 am WD says: Like or Dislike: 0 0An opposite result was decided by Texas courts. Go figure. Reply January 26, 2011 at 11:41 am Alan Anderson says: Like or Dislike: 0 0Doesn’t the GL policy typically cover faulty workmanship of a subcontractor while performing their duites for the GC? It’s not standing in as a bond for the sub but coverage for the negligent hiring and supervision by the GC of their subs. Reply Add a Comment Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * Name * Email * Comment ΔNotify me of comments via e-mail
An opposite result was decided by Texas courts. Go figure.
Doesn’t the GL policy typically cover faulty workmanship of a subcontractor while performing their duites for the GC?
It’s not standing in as a bond for the sub but coverage for the negligent hiring and supervision by the GC of their subs.