After reading the article regarding the findings of inadequate training and outdated equipment I went to the Charleston FD web site. There I found that it is rated Class 1 which is the best rating by ISO.
If the report states outdated equipment, then how could ISO give a rating of Class 1? I always thought that the ratings were based on water supply, manpower and EQIPMENT. Possibly ISO has some questions to answer.
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
This is the correct analysis. It could and should have been made a year sooner.
After reading the article regarding the findings of inadequate training and outdated equipment I went to the Charleston FD web site. There I found that it is rated Class 1 which is the best rating by ISO.
If the report states outdated equipment, then how could ISO give a rating of Class 1? I always thought that the ratings were based on water supply, manpower and EQIPMENT. Possibly ISO has some questions to answer.