An 18 year old ride operator and a 16 year old ride operator (assuming both have had the same training) are probably equally qualified to do the job. I don’t see how raising the age limit by 2 years will have any impact on amusement park ride accidents.
Amusement parks are dangerous, period. The rides are machines and all machines should be expected to fail at some point. That point may happen sooner or later depending on the maintenance and care of the machine, but there is always the possibility that something is just going to break.
Parents should know that’s a risk when they send their kids to an amusement park. What happened to this girl was extreme in nature, but as long as amusement parks exist, accidents can and WILL happen. Sometime they will occur due to negligence on behalf of the operator; or they’ll happen due to poor condition of the machine; or they’ll happen for no other reason than the ride just decided to shoot craps that day.
When I was a teen, I was badly injured in an amusement park ride. That was all it took for me to decide the thrill was SO not worth it. Granted, I knew my situation was rare; but for me, I didn’t feel like it was a chance I wanted to take ever again. As a family, my husband and son have gone to amusement parks a couple of times, but we’ve gone knowing there was a possibility one of them could get hurt. (I waited for them on the bench, with the other cowards, holding their cotton candy and popcorn.)
The amusement park and the manufacturer of the ride should compensate this family for their loss and then some for their pain and suffering. For the amusement park to say they had no liability is such a crock!
However, unless there are significant details left out of the article, I don’t see how the 18-years-of-age aspect of this legislation is going to prevent these types of things from happening. The only way to prevent amusement park accidents is to ban amusement parks completely.
As for requiring daily inspections of the rides, I’m not sure how big of a task that might be, but it surprises the heck out of me that amusement parks don’t already do so. That should be an industry standard.
If I were an amusement park owner, I would EXPECT to have to pay a crap ton in premiums to have coverage for injured riders; and I would EXPECT to have the occasional injured rider from the occasional malfunctioning machine. Duh, duh and duh.
I believe the age issue is to have an adult operating a dangerous ride in the belief that the ride may pose a hazard to the operator as well as the riders.
Children are generally prohibited from hazardous jobs.
I know when I was in high school working at the nearby amusement park wa “the thing” to do. But it was definately more about spending the summer at a “job” with all of your friends than really caring about what you were doing. Maybe the idea was that by raising the age to 18 you are no longer allowing at the high school kids who are their to hang out with their friends to operate dangerous machinery. Don’t know how much it will help but I guess I can kind of see the reasoning
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
An 18 year old ride operator and a 16 year old ride operator (assuming both have had the same training) are probably equally qualified to do the job. I don’t see how raising the age limit by 2 years will have any impact on amusement park ride accidents.
Amusement parks are dangerous, period. The rides are machines and all machines should be expected to fail at some point. That point may happen sooner or later depending on the maintenance and care of the machine, but there is always the possibility that something is just going to break.
Parents should know that’s a risk when they send their kids to an amusement park. What happened to this girl was extreme in nature, but as long as amusement parks exist, accidents can and WILL happen. Sometime they will occur due to negligence on behalf of the operator; or they’ll happen due to poor condition of the machine; or they’ll happen for no other reason than the ride just decided to shoot craps that day.
When I was a teen, I was badly injured in an amusement park ride. That was all it took for me to decide the thrill was SO not worth it. Granted, I knew my situation was rare; but for me, I didn’t feel like it was a chance I wanted to take ever again. As a family, my husband and son have gone to amusement parks a couple of times, but we’ve gone knowing there was a possibility one of them could get hurt. (I waited for them on the bench, with the other cowards, holding their cotton candy and popcorn.)
The amusement park and the manufacturer of the ride should compensate this family for their loss and then some for their pain and suffering. For the amusement park to say they had no liability is such a crock!
However, unless there are significant details left out of the article, I don’t see how the 18-years-of-age aspect of this legislation is going to prevent these types of things from happening. The only way to prevent amusement park accidents is to ban amusement parks completely.
As for requiring daily inspections of the rides, I’m not sure how big of a task that might be, but it surprises the heck out of me that amusement parks don’t already do so. That should be an industry standard.
If I were an amusement park owner, I would EXPECT to have to pay a crap ton in premiums to have coverage for injured riders; and I would EXPECT to have the occasional injured rider from the occasional malfunctioning machine. Duh, duh and duh.
I believe the age issue is to have an adult operating a dangerous ride in the belief that the ride may pose a hazard to the operator as well as the riders.
Children are generally prohibited from hazardous jobs.
No, it won’t. Just another piece of crap “feel good” but actually does no good legislation. What tripe.
I know when I was in high school working at the nearby amusement park wa “the thing” to do. But it was definately more about spending the summer at a “job” with all of your friends than really caring about what you were doing. Maybe the idea was that by raising the age to 18 you are no longer allowing at the high school kids who are their to hang out with their friends to operate dangerous machinery. Don’t know how much it will help but I guess I can kind of see the reasoning
Yea, when I was high in school I used to work at a musement park too man……
Its all automated. My real job was to make sure the girls all kept their private parts strapped in. I was good at my job.