Zach Scruggs Asks for Separation from Father in Katrina-Related Case

February 26, 2008

  • February 26, 2008 at 7:15 am
    Retired says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Maybe Trent Lott will divorce his Brother in-law Dickie also.

  • February 26, 2008 at 7:52 am
    Good Hands says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Little known is the fact that judge Lackey was actually offered $50,000 by Zach Scruggs. Zach’s ethical dilema? Whether to tell his partners or pocket the extra $10,000.

  • February 26, 2008 at 8:37 am
    T C says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    A federal that makes 40K yearly is a joke. I cannot recall one that isn’t approaching or already a millionaire; not counting the retirement fund for federal judges. If any of this turns out to be real,I would question why it was so little of a bribe…oh wait…perhaps the amount was insulting.

  • February 26, 2008 at 3:07 am
    Why not? says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Defendants allegedly offered $40,000 to a Magisrate to rule in their favor in a dispute over $26.5 million in Hurricane Katrina insurance settlement fees … Why not? The outcome would nearly double most judges’ annual compensation and we all know the insurance companies are going to be blamed regardless — exclusions? Simply small road bumps to recovery …

  • February 27, 2008 at 9:35 am
    Dustin says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Zach was denied a severance from his father. Oh well! Please read http://www.insurancecoverageblog.com for a lawyer’s great outline on this whole debacle. He does a great job explaining it all.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*