Fla. Lawmakers Seek Wider Search for Munitions on Former Bomb Range

November 13, 2007

  • November 13, 2007 at 2:21 am
    Bill Reed says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    American carmakers can’t produce a product that lasts will last longer than 5 years (long enough to pay it off) but we sure know how to build quality into munitions. These things have been around for 50+ years and are still “ticking”.

  • November 13, 2007 at 2:38 am
    Parson says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Instead of spending millions of dollars looking for a “bomb in a haystack”, turn a bunch of retirees loose with metal detectors.

  • November 13, 2007 at 3:54 am
    Dread says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    The beauty of using retirees is that they’d never hear the explosion.

  • November 13, 2007 at 4:24 am
    High Tecnology? says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Surely, with all the advanced technology we have in the US, the ACOE would be able to use infra-red or some other remote sensing technology to locate these things from the air? I can’t believe the only method ACOE has is to resort to shovels, bulldozers and guesswork. Anyone out there know whether there’s a better way to find those bombs besides random digging?

  • November 13, 2007 at 5:38 am
    SouthernBelle says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    It seems to me that the bombs would have gone off during the moving of dirt and building of the homes there. But they did
    not apparently. Ultrisound or Sonar? (They use it in archeology to find buried artifact, and in geogology to find voids deep underground.) It probably would be cheaper. But most of these devices are limited in the width of field.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*