Wait a minute…the judge says that it is hard to determine what expertise the expert was using, agreed it was confusing, but wouldn\’t give Nationwide a Daubert ruling on this character?!
And, after the \”engineer\” says that half of the $130,000 in damage is wind related, the Plaintiff\’s \”adjuster expert\” pegs the loss in the mid-40\’s?!
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
Wait a minute…the judge says that it is hard to determine what expertise the expert was using, agreed it was confusing, but wouldn\’t give Nationwide a Daubert ruling on this character?!
And, after the \”engineer\” says that half of the $130,000 in damage is wind related, the Plaintiff\’s \”adjuster expert\” pegs the loss in the mid-40\’s?!
Can you say, \”Appeal\”?