Texas Court Allows $70M Judgment in Workers’ Comp Case to Stand

December 16, 2009

  • December 16, 2009 at 2:38 am
    ??? says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 2

    FOR WHAT??? What a joke!

  • December 16, 2009 at 2:52 am
    Mateo says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 2

    Why not get the Obama bunch to jump on this atrocity? Or are their buddy in favor of these actions.

  • December 16, 2009 at 3:54 am
    joseph Stalin says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 2
    Thumb down 0

    This cannot be only the WC case. It must be for bad faith in the handling of it?

  • December 16, 2009 at 4:14 am
    micmac says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Is it possible this company is a non-subscriber. In TX employers can opt out of WC. Anyone out there familiar enough with the case to comment?

  • December 17, 2009 at 8:48 am
    Irene says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 2

    This amount is absurd and Discover must appeal. $20,000,000 for attorney fees? Sounds like the cowboy judge will be getting a fat check from the scumbag cowboy attorney.

  • December 17, 2009 at 9:22 am
    Batman says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 1

    Holy connect the dots, Mateo! How did Obama get into THIS? don’t you have a life? Find something else to do, like move to Alaska and get a job as Sarah Palin’s nanny…you won’t hve to kiss her a$$ but you’ll be right there to smell it when she F*rts!

  • December 17, 2009 at 10:31 am
    Marvin says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 1
    Thumb down 0

    To micmac..

    The article leaves no doubt whatsover that the company WAS a subscriber.

  • December 17, 2009 at 10:52 am
    Jason Anderson says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 2

    When are judges and jurys going to learn that large awards like this really only hurt the consumer.

    You don’t think the carrier is going to raise their rates now? Now other insureds are going to have to carry the burdon of this judgement.

    If the carrier did something wrong then yes they should be punished. But to the tune of $70m? Crazy!

  • December 17, 2009 at 12:54 pm
    matt says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 2

    Holy fart sniffer, Batman!

  • December 17, 2009 at 3:16 am
    TEXAS AGENT says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 1

    OH BATMAN, YOU HAVE SOME SERIOUS EMOTIONAL PROBLEMS! MUST BE YOUR WORK. TRY WORK COMP FOR YOUR EMOTIONAL PROBLEMS!!!!!!!!



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*