There needs to be a statue of limitations on this fiasco. I seriously question anyone who plods along for 20-40 years after an “alleged” incident, and suddenly comes forward when it becomes vogue and there’s money to be made. Giving people money doesn’t solve the problem. This notion of everything equates to money is archaic. I don’t care if it’s Catholics, Jews, Muslims, or whatever.
AS a condition of settlement are the accusers required to take a lie dectator test even though it could be agreed that the results of the test could not be disclosed or used in court? I think this should be a condition of any setlement.
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
There needs to be a statue of limitations on this fiasco. I seriously question anyone who plods along for 20-40 years after an “alleged” incident, and suddenly comes forward when it becomes vogue and there’s money to be made. Giving people money doesn’t solve the problem. This notion of everything equates to money is archaic. I don’t care if it’s Catholics, Jews, Muslims, or whatever.
Haven’t you heard? It’s never about the money. What I want to know is where it all seems to be going?
AS a condition of settlement are the accusers required to take a lie dectator test even though it could be agreed that the results of the test could not be disclosed or used in court? I think this should be a condition of any setlement.