Flurry of Rita-related Lawsuits Filed in Southeast Texas

October 2, 2007

  • October 3, 2007 at 1:36 am
    Roger Poe says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Why did Allstate and State Farm claim in Beaumont Texas that when composition fiberglass roofing shingles lose their wind resistance integrity because their tar-tab sealant bonds break because of wind lift, that that component damage is not really damage?

    Why, when shingles lift and become debris packed, and can’t reseal/reseat, is that not damage to the shingles?

    Why do shingle manufacturers understand damage to their products, but now Allstate and State Farm do not?

    Why did Allstate and State Farm claim that windborne debris that ground off shingles outer protective granuler component, is not really damage to the shingles?

    Did Allstate and State Farm “loss claim adjusters” swarm into and out of Beaumont and the rest of Southeast Texas (after hurricane Rita) as fast as they did so as to intentionally leave a trail of inncorrectly assessed and paid claims?

    Does denial/dismissal of historically obvious property damage constitute fair trade practice, and good faith contract fulfillment?

    What does Fema and the SBA records indicate as to how many Allstate and State Farm policyholders were made to go for loans or grants regarding liability issues Allstate and State Farm owe for?

    How is the T.W.I.A absorbing the Allstate clients that have hurricane Rita roofing, interior, and exterior damage that Allstate and State Farm pretends is not damage?

    Why did Allstate and State Farm both recognize those forms of wind damage outside of the Beaumont and South East Texas area before hurricane Rita?

    Because they can…kinda’.

    rogerpoegc@gmail.com



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*