Gee, maybe the governor could also \”urge\” the courts to not issue assinine rulings on flood coverage – the recent decision creating the complete artifice of a \”natural\” flood versus a \”man-made\” flood in an attempt to find coverage flies in the face of the plain language of the form, decades of use, scores of cases upholding the form, etc. If an insurer is competely at risk from out-of-control judges, as well as the ordinary risks in the state, why does anyone think the industry would want to stay there?
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
Gee, maybe the governor could also \”urge\” the courts to not issue assinine rulings on flood coverage – the recent decision creating the complete artifice of a \”natural\” flood versus a \”man-made\” flood in an attempt to find coverage flies in the face of the plain language of the form, decades of use, scores of cases upholding the form, etc. If an insurer is competely at risk from out-of-control judges, as well as the ordinary risks in the state, why does anyone think the industry would want to stay there?