Guns Missing From Oklahoma Museum Not Insured

February 27, 2006

  • February 28, 2006 at 2:10 am
    MJ says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Seems to me that they should have waived free admission instead of the insurance requirement.

  • February 28, 2006 at 2:27 am
    Jack says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    The State is being advised by it\’s risk manager to get to file a claim on the foundations policy for undervaluing it\’s collection? Neither entity paid premium which was the reason they didn\’t add the gun collection to the policy.I don\’t understand. What would keep all museums owned by the State but run by a foundation from undervaluing it\’s collection ? Even the State thinks the insurance co. is a cash cow!

  • February 28, 2006 at 3:46 am
    Bradley says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    So, do you have insurance? \”Oh yea, of course.\” So how many guns do you have and how are they valued? \”Well we have about 20,000. Either that or maybe 14,000, whos counting any way, I just know we got a lot of guns and they worth millions\”

  • February 28, 2006 at 4:14 am
    Tim Bucktwo says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    The state knows the ultimate cash cow is the tax payer. How the state packages the bill makes little difference. We the suckers are the insuror of last resort.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*