The insured’s bad-faith claim was actually remanded for the district court’s reconsideration:
FN #2: “. . . The district court granted Southern Mutual’s motion for summary judgment on this claim, holding that ‘[b]ecause the Court granted summary judgment on Greater Hall’s only underlying claim in this case—breach of contract—the Court must also grant summary judgment on the issue of bad faith penalties and attorney’s fees.’ Because we are reversing the district court’s grant of summary judgment on Greater Hall’s breach-of-contract claim, we remand Greater Hall’s bad-faith claim for reconsideration.”
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
The insured’s bad-faith claim was actually remanded for the district court’s reconsideration:
FN #2: “. . . The district court granted Southern Mutual’s motion for summary judgment on this claim, holding that ‘[b]ecause the Court granted summary judgment on Greater Hall’s only underlying claim in this case—breach of contract—the Court must also grant summary judgment on the issue of bad faith penalties and attorney’s fees.’ Because we are reversing the district court’s grant of summary judgment on Greater Hall’s breach-of-contract claim, we remand Greater Hall’s bad-faith claim for reconsideration.”