Americans Say ‘Yes’ to New Requirements for Teen Drivers

August 9, 2011

  • August 9, 2011 at 3:29 pm
    Publicus says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 3

    A much easier solution would be to simply raise the national driving age to 18 – with no exceptions. Might crimp the style of teenagers but it would certainly lower liability insurance costs.

  • August 9, 2011 at 3:31 pm
    Publicus says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    A far more simpler solution would be to just raise the national driving age to 18 – eith no exceptions. Might crimp teenagers’ activities but it would certainly lower liability insurance costs.

  • August 14, 2011 at 6:08 pm
    Markie says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 3
    Thumb down 0

    A word of caution, it is spossible that this plan may back fire since all it really does is retrict actions. Restricting only delays the problems so instead of happening to 16-18 years old they will happen to 18-20 years olds. The issue here is education, which is clearly lacking in this instance. This plan sounds to me like a bandaid not a cure for the problem at hand.

  • August 15, 2011 at 11:28 am
    GB says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 3
    Thumb down 0

    Good point Markie. A comprehensive driving course, including defensive driving, should be mandatory for all new drivers whether 16 or 60. The present Driver’s Ed covers some book material and some driving time without concentrating on the necessary skills for accident avoidance.
    This would work well in conjunction with the graduated drivers licenses.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*