California mis-logic strikes again. Diminution in value is a theory concocted by the attorneys. Unless they can prove that a significant number of potential buyer avoid Toyota’s because of this recall, it should be a non-issue. Quite frankly, it’s impossible. If there is a ruling in favor of such litigation, the plaintiffs should be required to provide proof that they in fact suffered economic loss, not just the potential of it.
Jester must be a Toyota employee. My toyota offed me $18,500 for my Rav 4 I owe 5 grand more than that and that was with 0% financing. You suffer economic loss by not getting what it is worth when you trade it in Read the specs before you run your mouth.
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
California mis-logic strikes again. Diminution in value is a theory concocted by the attorneys. Unless they can prove that a significant number of potential buyer avoid Toyota’s because of this recall, it should be a non-issue. Quite frankly, it’s impossible. If there is a ruling in favor of such litigation, the plaintiffs should be required to provide proof that they in fact suffered economic loss, not just the potential of it.
Jester must be a Toyota employee. My toyota offed me $18,500 for my Rav 4 I owe 5 grand more than that and that was with 0% financing. You suffer economic loss by not getting what it is worth when you trade it in Read the specs before you run your mouth.