Workers’ Compensation Patients Benefit Less from Back Surgery

February 3, 2010

  • February 3, 2010 at 2:55 am
    TN says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    “It is not clear why the results are different for patients on workers’ compensation—the difference remains even after adjustment for other patient characteristics.”

    They’re kidding, please tell me they’re kidding….

  • February 3, 2010 at 3:39 am
    nk says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Come on, 12% of 924 patients is 111 people. Hardly a proper sampling by any means. Who pays for this waste of time and energy for a garbage “study”?

  • February 3, 2010 at 4:30 am
    Leon O'Chruadhlaoich says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    for patients on workers compensation. 1) in Texas wc patients get a STATUTORY 104 WEEKS (2 YEARS) OF BENEFITS. Why go back to work when you can get paid for not working (This is NOT Aflac folks )! 2) An estimated 60 % of wc surgery in texas is performed by non-medical doctors (NMD’s). This should have been confounded into the results. 3) Many Licensed MD’s wont touch w/c leaving it open for NMD’s who are subject to much less stringent oversight (QA/UR) than private plans 4) most wc patients in Texas come through attorney-referred “invisble injury industry” clinics where EMG’s are not interpreted until after MRI’s are reported to “coincide” so the “newly created” reports can get past NURSE reviewers/LVN case managers (what a joke). 5)In Houston, figures (allegedly) show that a small group of MD’s (80 % of which never went to “medical school” in the US) work in a 4-block area and “create” 95 % of the wc cases there.

  • February 4, 2010 at 9:34 am
    Brian Donnelly says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Gee, can anyone say “Secondary Gain?”



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*