Job Bias Charges Jumped in 2009

January 7, 2010

  • January 7, 2010 at 11:39 am
    maria says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    As far as the EEOC is concerned the employee is always the victim. The EEOC should hire these people and have them see first hand why they got fired. As a business owner only knows you hire people to work for you not against you. Employers there are 3 rules in dealing with your employee
    rule 1. Document Rule 2. Document Rule 3. Document. Dot your I’s and cross your T’s
    the EEOC only cares about one thing and and trust me it does not involve the TRUTH it is all about how much can they take from the Business Owner. You would think that they are working on commission hahaha

  • January 7, 2010 at 1:36 am
    Jennifer says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    For some people, it is easier to file a discrimination case than it is to do their job’s.

  • January 7, 2010 at 2:41 am
    PRT says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I insured a lot of Not for Profit organizations. They are sued all the time for wrongful termination and discrimination. 99.9% are just people who want money after they’re rightfully terminated. You should see the EEOC paperwork I get. It’s disgusting!

  • January 7, 2010 at 3:17 am
    Cynthia says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    My husband experienced first hand the damage caused for not only being fired for his age, but the retaliation that caused him to be black balled in his profession after 25 years was criminal. No, he did not file charges but I think that was a mistake. Walk a day in his shoes and you may have a bit more compassion.

  • January 7, 2010 at 4:34 am
    Gus says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Honest to goodness claims deserve compassion. People who try to beat the system do not. Period. If your husbands claim is legit, he should have pursued it.

  • January 8, 2010 at 10:11 am
    Santos says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Comes on people, listen to yourselves! This is a good olds boy club. The EEOC is the agency that is an entity of the government. That means government employees loose more when they file an EEOC claim. The Government is not going to fight against themselves. The Government is going to fight against civilian business owners as they are not part of the good old boy’s network. So, Business owners learn the law and allege the EEOC is engaged in the unauthorized practice of law. As the EEOC cannot interpret the law to a third party busness owner. If you are going to fight on an equal playing field you should fight at the “Federal Court Level”. You have more power to fight. If enough lawsuits are filed against the EEOC for the unauthorized practice of law, the EEOC will be shut down. Congress gave the EEOC the power to conduct investigation on an administrative level when the EEOC goes after business owners. There is one problem; the business owner who has not agreed to administrative law is placed at a disadvantage. The EEOC is nothing but an administrative entity crossing the line to civilian business law. It is best to by past the EEOC even though the Federal Court wants you to go to the EEOC before filing a Federal lawsuit. Note the EEOC has no power in Federal Court. Business owner stand up for your rights or subject yourselves to the EEOC which are mostly non-lawyers. As for federal employees, the EEOC is not going to work against the Federal Government to give you money.
    Anyone care to allege I am wrong? I would like to here from federal employees, civilian business owners etc….
    Santos

  • January 8, 2010 at 1:37 am
    mark says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Santos, Please use spell check after you have completed a course in grammar.

  • January 8, 2010 at 1:59 am
    santos says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Is that All you could write. Oh,I get it, you went to grammar school, you don’t know how to write about the law. It figures.

  • January 8, 2010 at 4:14 am
    Mark says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Actually, no. What I need to say is I agree with Gus. If the claim is legit then there should be no problem with the employer or the EEOC. If the claim is bogus, then the employee should worry.

    Unfortunately, some people would rather lie than work. More often than not I will add. Most of us are tired of people like this.

  • January 8, 2010 at 4:17 am
    Megan says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I think Mark was right though. On both issues. You should read what you write before you send it out. The spelling and grammar need attention.

    I can write about spelling and grammar. I am a teacher……………….

    Are you a lawyer?



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*