U.S. Warned to Prepare Now for Disasters Caused by Global Warming

October 26, 2009

  • October 26, 2009 at 8:54 am
    Kool-Aid Hater says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Sigh. I rolled my eyes, too, but it doesn’t translate to text very well.

    That’s all.

  • October 26, 2009 at 9:15 am
    DanWealter says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Why doesn’t the Insurance Industry prepare for global warming. because they know its a farce

  • October 26, 2009 at 9:21 am
    Cher says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Markey is an Idiot. What Katrina was caused by our carbon foot print, the earth is flat as well.

  • October 26, 2009 at 11:43 am
    George says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    All Katrina foreshadowed was that it’s stupid to build a town underwater and protect it from flooding with earthen dams.

    My opinion: all this new climate change/global warming talk is just viral marketing for that ‘2012’ disaster movie starring John Cusack.

  • October 26, 2009 at 1:27 am
    Rick says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Ed Markey is synonymous with “the end of the world is coming”

  • October 26, 2009 at 1:29 am
    Lenny says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Why isn’t anyone listening to the reality that the earth has actually cooled. And when will someone please report the money around this farce. GE is a great example of a company that has determined how to make money on Global warming. Follow the money folks, we have all bought in to the sky is falling… chicken little…… By the way my meteorologist can’t forecast tomorrows weather right, how can he figure out the next decade….. oh yea thats right they are using the same computer model……… makes sense.

  • October 26, 2009 at 1:37 am
    Brian says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Carbon Dioxide, regardless of SCOTUS opinion, is not a pollutant, and the evidence, even more than previously, now points to global warming being, essentially, a hoax – politial in nature. Even if it were an issue, the total impact of all of the proposed legislation and emissions rules would be negligible over the next 50 to 100 years. did these idiots consider that the warming & cooling is cyclical and dependant, largely, on that large yellow HOT object called the SUN. Yet the lemmings believe. Anyone want to buy a bridge to nowehere?

  • October 26, 2009 at 1:38 am
    E. S. Keymo says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    You are right on Lenny. I remember the coming “New Ice Age” of the 1960s which also never happened. Thats what happens when we don’t teach history anymore and we don’t have an honest press.

  • October 26, 2009 at 1:41 am
    Back to the basics says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    We as humans, mammals breathe in oxygen and expel carbon dioxide. Plants breathe in carbon dioxide and expel oxygen. So the cycle continues. This is the way it goes. There are all kinds of cycles in this world the enable life to continue. This is one of them. The Global Warming and Global Cooling “scientist” are backed by politicians that want to control you and your money. Any politician reading this “NO CAP and TAX”. The voting public does not want it. Nor do we want the world government the proponents of (new vocab for Global Warming) Global Change. If you are going to look to “Katrina” to prove a point, then you must look back to the hurricanes, earthquakes and the tsunamis before the invention of the automobile and all those carbons, and then explain Global Change during that time period. Please let’s get on to real science, not popular science.
    A real friend of the Planet Earth.

  • October 26, 2009 at 1:55 am
    Reality Bites says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    At what point to you naysaying nabobs of negativism wake up and realize that in no way can we plant enough trees to absorb the pollutants and CO2 pumped out by an increasingly industrialized world?

    Do you truly think there is NO price to pay for our impact on the ecology? Damn the torpedoes; full speed ahead?

    Were any of you in Pittsburgh or Scranton or Detroit in the 1950’s or 60’s? How about current China or India? Set aside the loss of an economy; would you really WANT to be breathing all the pollutants that were pumped into the air, 24 hours a day when WE lead the world in output?

    At what point does the loss of Arctic ice impact you – forget about the cuddly bears and baby seals – when your Nevada property is beachfront? Are you willing to accept the price – for your grandchildren’s sake – if the ice DOESN’T grow back in 100 years?

    Sure humans have behaved stupidly, building homes where they don’t belong. Don’t blame that on cyclical weather patterns; rather it’s a need to control an environment which cannot always be controlled – to a great extent because we don’t UNDERSTAND the envirnonment properly.

    Is there a hole in the sky, Chicken Little? Don’t know, but there are holes in the ozone layer, and to what extent has modern life contributed to that?

    Can we afford to be right – and spend what needs to be spent for alternative energy sources (which are limited in supply)?

    Can we afford to be WRONG. That’s the question.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*