Trying a case in the Rio Grande Valley is always a bad idea. would have thought the plaintiffs could have dug up a better case than this one.. this plaintiff had too many health problems that killed him, but most of jury probably had his same health habits, or were close to some one that did the same.
Didn\’t the study show that heart problems occurred after 18 months of use? A man with heart problems for 20 years dies after using the product for 2 months and the product is the culprit? Sounds to me like the 20 years of heart trouble might have something to do with it. Besides, the dude was 71 years old. Isn\’t that like the normal life expectancy of a US male?
Anyone who took vioxx for arthritis and suffered a heart attack deserve to be compensated.since this poison drug causes heart attack as per thier own [merck research]do not matter weather you take it for 1 day or 18 months if it causes heart attack the poison kick in the very first time you take it.also,bear in mind that some people can drink 20 bottles of beer and never get drunk and some can only drink a bottle and feel drunk its the same reason why some people died right away and some dont.
your logic is just about as good as your spelling! The Valley is a judicial hellhole populated by people who expect the government or corporate America to support them.
My Mom was taken Vioxx for 6 years but the doctor or Merck didn\’t alerted her of the risk. She died of a stoke after suffering for srverel months. Merck knew of the risk 5 years earlyer. In a book that I bought Kevin Trudeau Natural Cures They Don\’t want you to know about on pgge 74 he says that the company that made Vioxx made BILLIONS in profit he then gose on to say that whisteblowers say that the decision was made to let people die because of the pontential huge profits that could be made
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
Trying a case in the Rio Grande Valley is always a bad idea. would have thought the plaintiffs could have dug up a better case than this one.. this plaintiff had too many health problems that killed him, but most of jury probably had his same health habits, or were close to some one that did the same.
Didn\’t the study show that heart problems occurred after 18 months of use? A man with heart problems for 20 years dies after using the product for 2 months and the product is the culprit? Sounds to me like the 20 years of heart trouble might have something to do with it. Besides, the dude was 71 years old. Isn\’t that like the normal life expectancy of a US male?
Anyone who took vioxx for arthritis and suffered a heart attack deserve to be compensated.since this poison drug causes heart attack as per thier own [merck research]do not matter weather you take it for 1 day or 18 months if it causes heart attack the poison kick in the very first time you take it.also,bear in mind that some people can drink 20 bottles of beer and never get drunk and some can only drink a bottle and feel drunk its the same reason why some people died right away and some dont.
your logic is just about as good as your spelling! The Valley is a judicial hellhole populated by people who expect the government or corporate America to support them.
My Mom was taken Vioxx for 6 years but the doctor or Merck didn\’t alerted her of the risk. She died of a stoke after suffering for srverel months. Merck knew of the risk 5 years earlyer. In a book that I bought Kevin Trudeau Natural Cures They Don\’t want you to know about on pgge 74 he says that the company that made Vioxx made BILLIONS in profit he then gose on to say that whisteblowers say that the decision was made to let people die because of the pontential huge profits that could be made
Uou think your safe in America THINK AGAIN.