So the real difference between rate of injury in properly restrained children in car vs. SUV is 1% (2% in cars, 3% in SUV). That seems statistically insignificant to me, especially given the myriad variables that this \”study\” can\’t possibly control for or even have data on (like driver error, which is a significant contributing factor to almost any rollover, SUV or otherwise).
From what I learned in physics, there is safety in mass, and all other things being equal, the big guy always wins.
I wonder how much StateFarm\’s policy holders paid for this one?
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
So the real difference between rate of injury in properly restrained children in car vs. SUV is 1% (2% in cars, 3% in SUV). That seems statistically insignificant to me, especially given the myriad variables that this \”study\” can\’t possibly control for or even have data on (like driver error, which is a significant contributing factor to almost any rollover, SUV or otherwise).
From what I learned in physics, there is safety in mass, and all other things being equal, the big guy always wins.
I wonder how much StateFarm\’s policy holders paid for this one?