It is really interesting to observe the interpretation of the commonly understood terms ‘care’, ‘ctody’ and ‘control’ with ref to insurance coverage and incidents. I tend to agree with the court’s interpreation that insured (hotel) has a reasonal responsibility toprovide adequate security, especially when services are charged. It is almost a wake-up call for insurers to review the endorsement wording for its adequacy and sync wit exclusions.
Appreciate the author.
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
It is really interesting to observe the interpretation of the commonly understood terms ‘care’, ‘ctody’ and ‘control’ with ref to insurance coverage and incidents. I tend to agree with the court’s interpreation that insured (hotel) has a reasonal responsibility toprovide adequate security, especially when services are charged. It is almost a wake-up call for insurers to review the endorsement wording for its adequacy and sync wit exclusions.
Appreciate the author.