Progressive Insurance Device Helps Clear Ohio Man in Death

July 9, 2013

  • July 22, 2013 at 10:53 am
    The Bigger Lewbowski says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 4
    Thumb down 1

    That proves absolutely nothing. I would’ve thought it could have proven that he came home, smothered the child, and then got back in the car. And how can the medical examiner exactly point, to the minute, when the baby was smothered? Ridiculous.

  • July 29, 2013 at 5:38 pm
    OzDaddy says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    It doesn’t prove anything other than he arrived and left three minutes later, taking the baby to the hospital. This is not the action of someone who just committed murder, though. Also, M.E.’s have the ability to be very accurate. Pathology at its’ finest.

  • July 30, 2013 at 8:12 am
    The Biggest Lewbowksi says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 1
    Thumb down 0

    I’ll agree that doubt of guilt is not apparent from the reported information in this story but neither is evidence of guilt. You’re supposed to give this person the presumption of evidence. Sadly most people operate exactly the opposite which you’ve just demonstrated.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *