If EMC thinks their potential liability for arming qualified school employees is to be avoided, what happens if a Newtown style loss occurs in a school who did not arm any employee(s)in order to maintain their policy with EMC? Instead of being so myopic, wouldn’t laying down guidelines for who qualifies under their policy be a more prudent and relevant way to mitigate their anticipated exposure? Not to mention the bad press…
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
If EMC thinks their potential liability for arming qualified school employees is to be avoided, what happens if a Newtown style loss occurs in a school who did not arm any employee(s)in order to maintain their policy with EMC? Instead of being so myopic, wouldn’t laying down guidelines for who qualifies under their policy be a more prudent and relevant way to mitigate their anticipated exposure? Not to mention the bad press…