Kansas Supreme Court Hears Gun Liability Case

February 1, 2013

  • February 1, 2013 at 3:29 pm
    bob says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 2
    Thumb down 0

    it’s outrageous that the appeals court would overturn the trial court. sounds liike the gunshop followed the letter of the law. where is their negligence? let’s hope the suprme court sees it correctly: no liability.

  • February 1, 2013 at 4:35 pm
    phil parker says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 1
    Thumb down 0

    Sadly, these things aren’t about liability anymore. They seem, more & more, to be about innocent families who suffer loss, needing compensation and finding anyone with a pocket to provide it.

    I’m getting tired of hearing how insurance companies are liable committed torts. Insurance companies are not liable, the insured’s are, the comapanies merely pay on behalf under contract.

  • February 4, 2013 at 5:27 pm
    Susan says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    If he used a shotgun purchased by his grandmother, where is the liability of the gun shop. It looked like this guy was denied a gun by 2 other gun shops. He didn’t buy the one he used, the grandmother did.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*