The condition was known, open, and obvious for two years yet the parent allowed the girls to go down the hill. There is an assumption of risk to boot. If the parent thought it too dangerous, he should have gone elsewhere. It’s unforuntate the children were injured and this is a sympathy case. Otherwise, it would have been vigorously defended. The parents have no choice but to mine the deep pocket to cover the paralyzed child’s expenses for life.
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
The condition was known, open, and obvious for two years yet the parent allowed the girls to go down the hill. There is an assumption of risk to boot. If the parent thought it too dangerous, he should have gone elsewhere. It’s unforuntate the children were injured and this is a sympathy case. Otherwise, it would have been vigorously defended. The parents have no choice but to mine the deep pocket to cover the paralyzed child’s expenses for life.