Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Traffic Stop of Drunk Driver

May 28, 2009

  • May 28, 2009 at 10:44 am
    Left around to the Right says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Left of center at 1:30 am…No Way can this person blow over legal….No Way. Just glad he was caught before he drove into my lane.

  • May 28, 2009 at 1:56 am
    wudchuck says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    i agree. they probably had ran his plates and due to already having 2 dwi’s, felt that his driving across the centerline, was enough to say hello. i agree! and then to find out he was over the limit?! what else could the judge do! this was one way that the defendant was trying to get out of STRIKE 3! many states, it’s a lifetime revoked license. it should be jailtime for a long time this time.

  • May 28, 2009 at 2:14 am
    Ed says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    how can someone be driving at 1:30 am cross the center line and a cop say hey we should check this guy out and the appeals court say they had no reason to pull him over? is there no common sense in the appeals court in Wisconson? I find it funny how hard people who are guilty will fight to not be guilty but never stop and say hey which costs less a cab or a lawyer?

  • May 28, 2009 at 2:20 am
    Scott says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    There is no defending this guy but I’d be careful what you wish for. Seems probable cause is a thing of the past and that doctrine is now being re-affirmed by the Courts. No knock warrants are a real problem in my home State. Of course it has been long established here that Police can pull over any vehicle at anytime for any or no reason at all.

  • May 28, 2009 at 3:06 am
    Dread says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    The good news is the court got the decision right. The bad news is that the DUI counts will continue to mount since our pathetically flawed legal system lacks the guts to pull his license for life. Without a significant consequence the DUI problem will continue. License suspension/revocation coupled with impoundment of ANY vehicle the drunk is caught driving is the only way to make the point.

  • May 28, 2009 at 3:07 am
    Fred says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    What state are you in Scott?
    This still the United States

  • May 28, 2009 at 3:15 am
    Big Mike In CALI says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Hey, Fred, think jurisdiction. DUI laws vary state to state, as do the penalties per offense; heck, some states still use the archaic “DWI” moniker! Scott’s observation seems appropriate.

  • May 28, 2009 at 3:33 am
    Fred says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I totally agree that the system should not be letting these folks off. I was wondering what State (or jurisdiction) can pull over without probable cause.
    This guy crossed the line at 1:30 am that is enough for me, even if he didn’t and the cop ran the plate and saw previous DUI’s, that should be enough probable cause.

  • May 28, 2009 at 3:37 am
    leprechaun says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    The Irish have a somewhat well-deserved reputation for hitting the bottle. But NO ONE drives after tipping a few except tourists because of the fines and auto impoundment. Even rentals are confiscated…

  • May 28, 2009 at 4:44 am
    WiSam says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I live in WI. We do have suspension, revocation, impoundment, anti-lock, jail and other deterrents. However until recently there was no jail requirement until after a 3rd or sometimes 4th offense. Our small town paper is filled with the court records, and 80-90% is related to DUI offenses, many of them 3rd or more offenses.

    I’m not normally in line with with the WI Supreme Court here, but in this case they got it right!



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*