Mich. Senate Votes to Require Ignition Devises in Drunk Driving Cases

December 12, 2008

  • December 12, 2008 at 2:36 am
    CMC says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    If they are so indigent – why do they even have cars & insurance? What does the device cost a couple hundred bucks??

  • December 12, 2008 at 2:42 am
    kegger says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    you know they’re spending all their money on booze, that’s why they can’t afford an interlock!

  • December 12, 2008 at 2:45 am
    CMC says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Ohhhh – now I see why tax papers should pay for it. We could provide some of the booze too while we’re at it.

  • December 12, 2008 at 5:48 am
    wudchuck says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    well, problem is that person might want to borrow my car or a friends car. neither of those cars would be required to have this interlock.

    1) suspend lic min 48 hrs on the first dwi.
    if more than twice the limit – install the interlock device.

    2) suspend lic min 1 yr on second one, incl a interlock device (habitual offender).

    3) suspend lic lifetime on third one.

    on any case where interlock device is required, suspended until that device has been installed. 2nd and 3rd dwi’s w/in the past 10 yrs!

  • December 15, 2008 at 12:26 pm
    Doug says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Suspend Wudchuck from commenting on any more articles?



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*