No bad faith there. It is the attorneys fault for not reading the insurance contract and knowing she only had twelve months to file suit. Now she can have a case against him for malpractice.
so the timely letters, did they count against the time of filing? it should not since both parties were talking. if nothing was resolved, then why not take it to court. then again, was it a push on the insurance company to keep writing and not settling? thus allowing the timeline to fall. then to me, that would be in bad faith.
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
No bad faith there. It is the attorneys fault for not reading the insurance contract and knowing she only had twelve months to file suit. Now she can have a case against him for malpractice.
so the timely letters, did they count against the time of filing? it should not since both parties were talking. if nothing was resolved, then why not take it to court. then again, was it a push on the insurance company to keep writing and not settling? thus allowing the timeline to fall. then to me, that would be in bad faith.