Happy Birthday Visit Ends with Lawsuit Between Daughter, Mother

July 14, 2006

  • July 14, 2006 at 8:19 am
    Debra Kegley says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Dear Chief Trade Negotiator:

    Franklin Tom, Esq. Vice President Legal Services. Health Net of California, Inc. 21650 Oxnard Street, Suite 2125. Woodland Hills, CA 91367 .

    RE: ABO Typing to transfer liabilty. [H]

    Guess, you\’ll have to figure a way to salvage this yourself. And, by the way…
    As an official patient in the USS Indiana (Battleship # 1, BB-1). Your Insurance Companies cumulative contempt, in decreasingly the likely hood to be prosecuted under health and safety laws. And a warehouse full of others too [H.C.A.]., partstrain exhaust medical records storage department, smells like rotten eggs.

    Another salvage coding cut: Look Familar: 104, 1966?

    Born: 10/6/1964, in Lansing, MI, USA

    http://www.databasebasketball.com/players/playerpage.htm?ilkid=BERRYRI01

    Disclosing those TU 5/1966, Twin Lake\’s Community Hospital ER medical records, in your perception, was not the principle of legality.

    Famiularity breeds Cumulative contempt, your the source code Foundation Health Corporation.

    Guess, you\’ll have to figure a way to salvage this yourself. And, by the way…

    CC: US Department of Veterans Affairs on Behalf of William R. Kegley.

  • July 15, 2006 at 12:15 pm
    Dasfuk says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    This is what I got out of the article.

    Daughter fell on ice and snow on the insured\’s (mother) driveway. Mother turns it in to her homeowners. They deny due to natural accumulation of ice and snow (not sure of the laws in WI where it appears the accident happened). Daughter will not accept med pay from carrier and is going to sue. She has to file the complaint against her mom, cause she can\’t file against the carrier. In the mean time after brainstorming (with daughter and an attorney), mother (insured) writes a nice little letter saying \”Oh sorry honey. We created an un-natural accumulation of ice with our broken downspout (that they ripped off their house in June). Liability now exists. Daugther gets some sort of pay out and I am sure the insured will get something from her daughter. Hopefully a judge or jury will see these people for what they are.

  • July 14, 2006 at 1:34 am
    sal says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    That\’s just sad. Next, she\’ll be suing her kids for causing stretch marks during pregnancy.

  • July 14, 2006 at 1:40 am
    DH says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Bet you the daughter fell at or after the tavern visit. Whatever the case, this age group is ridiculous – all they say in the work place or socially is \”I\’ll sue\”. Why don\’t they get lives instead.

  • July 14, 2006 at 1:41 am
    Mama says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    NOT UNTIL MY KIDS ARE OLD ENOUGH TO WRITE THAT DAMN SMOKIN\’ GUN LETTER IN APOLOGY!! (Until then, I\’ll just sue their father for creating them…)

  • July 14, 2006 at 1:44 am
    Compman says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Maybe they can go on Jerry Springer and fight it out. How pathetic our society has become. I like the stretchmark comment. But why not let the baby sue its mother for invasion of privacy (ultrsounds)and emotional and physical damage for being couped up in the womb for nine months!. God only knows this will be a headline in the years to come.

  • July 14, 2006 at 1:45 am
    Jack says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    A third party was injured due to the parents\’ negligence, and their insurer should pay the damages. The claimant\’s status as a daughter is irrelevant.

  • July 14, 2006 at 1:47 am
    Kimberly says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    I second the Jerry Springer notion. The judge should\’ve thrown this one out.

  • July 14, 2006 at 1:47 am
    Mama says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Now that\’s love. I can see your family gatherings…\”Happy Birthday Third Party (daughter)!\”

  • July 14, 2006 at 1:50 am
    Compman says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Why the lawsuit if it was indeed turned into the insurance carrier? Maybe the carrier denied the claim believing it to be bogus.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*