What about benefits for three women who live together? Howsabout a boy and his dog?
Society should make every effort to discourage the spread of disease and heartache endemic in lifestyles characterized by sexual perversion, just as it has discouraged cigarette smoking by making it less convenient to smoke. Granting benefits to \”gays\” because they live together is like forbidding insurance underwriters from knowing if the potential insured is a smoker.
Pat, when are you and your friends like the AFA going to quit using the ridiculous \”Adam & Steve\” \”marry a goat\” kind of faux logic to force your narrow opinions down our throats and into law? Monogamy and committment STOP the spread of disease in gay, straight, mixed and probably even animal couples. If you want to live in a religious state, there\’s a whole bunch of \’em in the Middle East right now – why don\’t you try them? If it has to be Christian, try the Holy See in Rome. Or buy yourself an island.
Hey genius, first of all I didn\’t say a word about religion. For all you know I\’m an atheist. One need not be \”religious\” to have common sense.
Second, answer this question: Should three women be allowed to marry?
Yes___
No____
If not, why not?
The same impulses that compel people to engage in same sex relations (which is the ultimate narcisism) allow some of them to go so far as to want to overturn 6,000 years of recorded human history and redefine the foundations of social order -marriage and the family. I can imagine no more selfish agenda. You call me bigoted, but such an agenda is evidence of your hatred for the human race.
So go on, tell us why three women or a boy and his dog or sisters and brothers should not be allowed to marry, and whether or not it is bigoted to oppose such \”marriages.\”
Like all people with a weak argument, you pursue the question of why 3 women should marry. That question, along with whatever answer you give, is not relevant to the issue. You base your entire argument on ‘ANSWER ME, ANSWER ME!!!!!!!I’m right and I can prove it. Whether 3 people or a dog and a boy can marry is outside the argument. We are talking about two people of the same sex getting benefits. The Michigan University system, for whatever reason, granted same sex couples health benefits. So what. Try denying benefits to illegals. It doesn’t work. Don’t you have more important things to worry about. You have mentioned bigots and people destroying civilization but I will guarantee that only if we allow bigots like yourself to gain control will civilization as we know it cease to exist. Which class of people will you go after after you have conquered the gays. If I were you I would target the Muslims. They appear to be more of a threat than gays. After all, they are not Christians and have already shown their distain for western civilization.
You blow smoke very well but with each word you write you show how much hatred is in your heart. Maybe you should look inward and find out why you have so much hate in you.
\”We are talking about two people of the same sex getting benefits. The Michigan University system, for whatever reason, granted same sex couples health benefits. So what.\”
The point of marriage is not fringe benefits. So What? Maybe Michiganders don\’t want to pay for bennies for buggers. Just a thought. And no one will answer whether three women should be allowed to marry to get bennies, when a simple Yes or No would do. Why the reticence?
\”If I were you I would target the Muslims. They appear to be more of a threat than gays. After all, they are not Christians and have already shown their distain for western civilization.\”
People who advocate gay \”marriage\” are not Christian either, but they are equally as destructive to our civilization as the terrorists are. Then again, I have yet to base my opinion on any religious point. You are so anti-Christiant that you leap at the chance to call them names, despoite the merely rational basis for my position.
So should three women be allowed to marry, and if not, why not?
It is an acknowledgement and affirmation to the strength of your position that they must attack & ridicule you personally to advance their position. The attack on Christianity by the Theo-phobes is so focused in fact that I call it \”Jesus Envy\”.
\”It is an acknowledgement and affirmation to the strength of your position that they must attack & ridicule you personally to advance their position.\”
It\’s not my position though, it is 6,000 years of recorded history of mankind\’s position- not to mention 75% of the American public. They want to redefine humanity in order to get health insurance for this month\’s boyfriend!
The Mormons are going to sue eventually to get back their polygamy if sodomists are allowed to \”marry.\” The dirty little secret is that most of them don\’t want to marry because they are addicted to wild promiscuity.
\”The attack on Christianity by the Theo-phobes is so focused in fact that I call it \’Jesus Envy.\’\”
Actually, all they envy is married people, or \”breeders\” as they call them, because they get bennies at work for their partners. They don\’t envy Jesus, they hate Him.
What a typical respone from people like Pat and the rest of the right wing religious nut cases. Didn\’t people like Pat say the same thing when interfaith and interracial marriages started?
We have updated our privacy policy to be more clear and meet the new requirements of the GDPR. By continuing to use our site, you accept our revised Privacy Policy.
What about benefits for three women who live together? Howsabout a boy and his dog?
Society should make every effort to discourage the spread of disease and heartache endemic in lifestyles characterized by sexual perversion, just as it has discouraged cigarette smoking by making it less convenient to smoke. Granting benefits to \”gays\” because they live together is like forbidding insurance underwriters from knowing if the potential insured is a smoker.
As long as you can \”get up in it,\” its COVERED!!
Pat, when are you and your friends like the AFA going to quit using the ridiculous \”Adam & Steve\” \”marry a goat\” kind of faux logic to force your narrow opinions down our throats and into law? Monogamy and committment STOP the spread of disease in gay, straight, mixed and probably even animal couples. If you want to live in a religious state, there\’s a whole bunch of \’em in the Middle East right now – why don\’t you try them? If it has to be Christian, try the Holy See in Rome. Or buy yourself an island.
Hey genius, first of all I didn\’t say a word about religion. For all you know I\’m an atheist. One need not be \”religious\” to have common sense.
Second, answer this question: Should three women be allowed to marry?
Yes___
No____
If not, why not?
The same impulses that compel people to engage in same sex relations (which is the ultimate narcisism) allow some of them to go so far as to want to overturn 6,000 years of recorded human history and redefine the foundations of social order -marriage and the family. I can imagine no more selfish agenda. You call me bigoted, but such an agenda is evidence of your hatred for the human race.
So go on, tell us why three women or a boy and his dog or sisters and brothers should not be allowed to marry, and whether or not it is bigoted to oppose such \”marriages.\”
Pat is sad sad lonely person. Perfect example of the misguided religious \”christian\”. Sad to know that people like Pat exist.
Like all people with a weak argument, you pursue the question of why 3 women should marry. That question, along with whatever answer you give, is not relevant to the issue. You base your entire argument on ‘ANSWER ME, ANSWER ME!!!!!!!I’m right and I can prove it. Whether 3 people or a dog and a boy can marry is outside the argument. We are talking about two people of the same sex getting benefits. The Michigan University system, for whatever reason, granted same sex couples health benefits. So what. Try denying benefits to illegals. It doesn’t work. Don’t you have more important things to worry about. You have mentioned bigots and people destroying civilization but I will guarantee that only if we allow bigots like yourself to gain control will civilization as we know it cease to exist. Which class of people will you go after after you have conquered the gays. If I were you I would target the Muslims. They appear to be more of a threat than gays. After all, they are not Christians and have already shown their distain for western civilization.
You blow smoke very well but with each word you write you show how much hatred is in your heart. Maybe you should look inward and find out why you have so much hate in you.
\”We are talking about two people of the same sex getting benefits. The Michigan University system, for whatever reason, granted same sex couples health benefits. So what.\”
The point of marriage is not fringe benefits. So What? Maybe Michiganders don\’t want to pay for bennies for buggers. Just a thought. And no one will answer whether three women should be allowed to marry to get bennies, when a simple Yes or No would do. Why the reticence?
\”If I were you I would target the Muslims. They appear to be more of a threat than gays. After all, they are not Christians and have already shown their distain for western civilization.\”
People who advocate gay \”marriage\” are not Christian either, but they are equally as destructive to our civilization as the terrorists are. Then again, I have yet to base my opinion on any religious point. You are so anti-Christiant that you leap at the chance to call them names, despoite the merely rational basis for my position.
So should three women be allowed to marry, and if not, why not?
It is an acknowledgement and affirmation to the strength of your position that they must attack & ridicule you personally to advance their position. The attack on Christianity by the Theo-phobes is so focused in fact that I call it \”Jesus Envy\”.
\”It is an acknowledgement and affirmation to the strength of your position that they must attack & ridicule you personally to advance their position.\”
It\’s not my position though, it is 6,000 years of recorded history of mankind\’s position- not to mention 75% of the American public. They want to redefine humanity in order to get health insurance for this month\’s boyfriend!
The Mormons are going to sue eventually to get back their polygamy if sodomists are allowed to \”marry.\” The dirty little secret is that most of them don\’t want to marry because they are addicted to wild promiscuity.
\”The attack on Christianity by the Theo-phobes is so focused in fact that I call it \’Jesus Envy.\’\”
Actually, all they envy is married people, or \”breeders\” as they call them, because they get bennies at work for their partners. They don\’t envy Jesus, they hate Him.
What a typical respone from people like Pat and the rest of the right wing religious nut cases. Didn\’t people like Pat say the same thing when interfaith and interracial marriages started?