Sex Injury on Work Trip Not Covered, Australia Court Says

By Joe Schneider | October 30, 2013

  • November 1, 2013 at 3:11 pm
    Claims Gal says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 4
    Thumb down 0

    That lady is an idiot!!!!!

  • November 4, 2013 at 12:49 pm
    Huh! says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 4
    Thumb down 0

    It’s nice to see the courts rule on the side of common sense.

  • November 11, 2013 at 11:30 am
    lynninms says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 2
    Thumb down 0

    What would the outcome have been had she been in the US? Do you think it would have been covered with our court system? I agree with the court ruling, but think US judges are much more sympathetic to employees, not employers and big money insurance companies.

  • November 11, 2013 at 11:45 am
    southernadjuster says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 1
    Thumb down 0

    I don’t thing there is a Judge in the US that would rule in her favor. She was there for a budget meeting. I doubt having sex after hours would be consider activity while in the course and scope of your business. Well…maybe if she were in the call girl business she might be able to get over that course and scope high hurdle. Ridiculous claim.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*