Malaysian Hindu Mother’s Insurance Case Highlights Religious Conflicts

February 1, 2008

  • February 1, 2008 at 1:46 am
    Having your cake & eating it says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Seems the Muslim community wants it cake and eat it too. Good comment about inequality of benefits depending upon religious belief. She should not settle for even 80%, she should get the whole thing. Wonder if they want to refund a third of the premiums too?

  • February 1, 2008 at 3:49 am
    Al says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Ain’t it something how Muslim laws always benefit Muslims at the expense of everyone else? Ever noticed that?

  • February 1, 2008 at 5:09 am
    Good Hands says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    This should be more simple than it is. Receiving the proceeds of an insurance policy is not an inheritance–it is the exercise of a contract. If there is any justice in Islam the mother will get the full benefit of the contract that was purchased. Is Allah just?

  • February 2, 2008 at 5:24 am
    wudchuck says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    it’s a contract that the insurance is responsible for giving to the named party. now, if the contract is want bindable at the time of the contract, he should have been told and the contract should have been voided at the time of signing. now, it should be valid and any mistakes are that of the company who sold the contract/insurance. they should pay out 100% to her.

    but how is it, it’s ok, to accept money from a non-muslim – but not give it to a non-muslim? are we making sure that some of the money gets sent elsewhere? instead of to their respective parties. sounds like a fish swimming upstream and can’t find the water to swim in, only dry land (where’s the oasis)?!

  • February 3, 2008 at 11:26 am
    SJS says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Have you noticed, only in Malaysia the Islamic Law always benefit / favour the Muslims at the expenses of non muslims. No matter what , the muslim is in wrong side also, the law will be in favour of them. What is this lah, Muslim can take money but cannot give money to non muslims. Good Law! Keep it up!

  • February 3, 2008 at 11:58 am
    Dave says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Allah is definitely just.don’t blame Him for this.It is the people who make up this rules witout any concern for others to be blamed.Allah loves all irrespective of religion.She should not settle for 80%, give the whole thing to her, it is hers.Why is 61 year old poor woman being bullied?have you no heart?Allah please lead this people to the right path. Thank You By A Hindu

  • February 4, 2008 at 12:04 pm
    shamsuddin says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    Bent over to the muslims after losing a limp or a buck and they are appeased. How about them bending over for a change, I mean a pure and simple bending over.

  • February 4, 2008 at 2:57 am
    LIM HUA TIONG says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    The old lady should get the whold sum of the inssurance money. Although her son embrace islam, he is still her son. Do the islamic affair try to denny that?

  • February 4, 2008 at 9:14 am
    Al says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    “Is Allah just?”

    No, his followers believe e.g. that he wants them to kill and subjugate non-Muslims, and that the testimony of women in court must be supported by four men’s testimony. This latter rule explains the extraordinarily high rate of rape in Muslim countries.

  • February 4, 2008 at 9:30 am
    Al says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 0
    Thumb down 0

    “Allah is definitely just.don’t blame Him for this.”

    You don’t know what you’re talking about.

    Sharia laws from the Hadiths and the Koran are absolutely immutable and valid for eternity, there is no hope that these laws can be diminished by reform or through peaceful means.

    Mohammed’s example –committing mass murder of captives, sleeping with his nine year-old “wife” Aisha, getting first dibs on captured slave girls and booty, and so on– speaks for itself.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*