Pittsburgh Zoo: Boy’s Mauling Death is Mom’s Fault

September 13, 2013

  • September 13, 2013 at 2:49 pm
    Reagan says:
    Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 39
    Thumb down 1

    The attorney abd the parents are the shameful ones.

    What the hell did she think the 4 foot railing was for?

    She lifted her toddler up and then dropoped him into a pack of wild dogs.

    She should be in jail, not suing the zoo.

    • September 14, 2013 at 6:32 pm
      judith lustig says:
      Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
      Thumb up 13
      Thumb down 0

      Perfectly stated, Reagan. I don’t know how the mother was not arrested.

  • September 14, 2013 at 4:33 pm
    Felix says:
    Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 10
    Thumb down 0

    Of course the parents’ attorney is going to lie … that’s how he gets paid. Does anyone (other than me) understand the reason for a FOUR FOOT tall railing ?!?

  • September 16, 2013 at 1:53 pm
    confused says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 9
    Thumb down 0

    And you wonder why insurance rates keep increasing it is from frivolous Lawsuits likes this. For God Sakes The fence is that high for a reason. Sad part is she probably win . Makes me sick

  • September 16, 2013 at 2:52 pm
    Jester says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 9
    Thumb down 0

    The mother should be charged with negligence. What would posess a partent to lift a two year old atop a fence to get a better look at “wild african dogs”? Only and idiot would do that. Now she’s trying to make herself feel better by suing the zoo. If there was ever a case for a directed verdict this is it.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*